>>7754756 (PB)

My two cents … if the planefag doesn't provide an explanation of why the cap has particular significance, the cap is NOT NOTABLE and should not see light of day elsewhere.

Perhaps we should mark notable planefag caps with something along the lines of

→PF

and use the designation sparingly.

Any post without the marking would be considered as "background" information and probably not notable unless the requisite number of other Anons (two) nominate it.