got 'em
>www.glamiscalling.org
>larps have their own websites
anyone can make a God.com these days and pretend to be god.
with "freedom to speak" comes the "duty to hear".
>I have no duty to hear you
what i meant was - if YOU want to speak your mind, YOU should also be ready to hear.
so basically what you meant, just in some other words.
>speak, only if you have the capacity to hear
obviously.
>You make me laugh
right?
people catch on to one conspiracy and stick to it like their lives depend on it - not even bothering to wonder whether their conspircy theory is valid or not.
this is the reason why mason-bashing-fags won't shut up about everything being the wrong-doing of the masons or the jew-bashing-fags with the jews.
they don't even understand that a person could be more than one thing - a single man could be a nigger muslim billionaire banker mason who sacrifices babies to moloch.
and none of his "tags" make him do what he does - he does evil because he is evil.
>choose to kill
why don't they ever just choose to use protection?
or better yet, not have sex outside of marriage?
what is sex but extension of love? why would you have sex with someone you don't love enough to get married to first?
t. gen x.
qanon.news has that feature.
i think if all our aggregator websites have at least one great feature that the others don't.
>unfounded interpretations through titles
the only feature of qmap.pub i'm not too keen on.
i checked out qarchives.ga just now -
straight up q post screencaps one by one. no extra fluff. but of course i think the page should o[pen to the q posts directly. hopefully MA is reading this.
if you are married, you should express your love for your partner via sex. nothing wrong in that. and use protection if you don't want kids.
condom+pill = 0% chance of pregnancy