Anonymous ID: cae8c6 Jan. 10, 2020, 3:19 a.m. No.7771030   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1042

>>7770994

TY Baker!!!

 

https://twitter.com/catturd2/status/1215497000797511680

 

Catturd

@catturd2

Did Matt Gaetz @mattgaetz

ruin his career in 5 seconds flat today, or what.

 

What a time to take some BS stand, and vote with Pelosi.

 

I promise, all my trust in him was zapped away in a flash.

 

I donโ€™t give a damn what his excuse is. Donโ€™t want to hear it.

 

Talk to the paw.

Anonymous ID: cae8c6 Jan. 10, 2020, 5 a.m. No.7771333   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7771311

>>7771321

Also just noticed that if you click the "Archive" box, and make a post, the box stays clicked for subsequent posts.

 

CM

If that's not intentional, you might want to add a reset box after post completion. Else, the archives might get bombarded (unless that's what you want to test it out).

Anonymous ID: cae8c6 Jan. 10, 2020, 5:21 a.m. No.7771413   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1441

>>7771348

>>7771382

Q is the proposed "source" document for the New Testament gospels. This is something I remember reading about as early as 2004 when doing a discipleship study with the pastor of my church, back then. Some argue that Matthew is the Q source, and the other 3 are based on Matthew. The reason for this is as you start to dig into the variances of details from one gospel to the next, you find that the timelines aren't perfect when comparing with canonical accounts of history.

 

Lots of folks have uploaded videos and made blog posts talking about this, and much of it goes unanswered by believers. Basically, the Jesus timeline appears to get a bit shaky as the authors of the gospels place that same events during Christ's life at different times in Roman history when compared to the accounts of events from Roman historians.