>>7772573

Quit backpedaling, Doug. I know you're reading this.

Clarification is fine. Apology unnecessary.

"I said what I said in facetiousness and frustration, but it really does seem that Democrats would rather side against the President even if it means that most Americans would wonder why they would want to coddle a murdering terrorist's friends.

I can't apologize for my statement when that's the meaning behind it. Let's see the Democrats explain how I'm not right. Ask the American people."

>>7772707

Take no offense. I agree.

Think ES.

>>7772738

It will be hidden under Obama's presidential papers exclusion…

Unless a court decides that such exclusion cannot supercede the authority of the courts to compel disclosure.

Where are you, Judicial Watch?

>>7773277

>>7773316

Or you just reverse the watchband