>>7772406 (pb)
if someone has a '56 Biscaynne that can fly, are they banned from coming over too?
>>7772406 (pb)
if someone has a '56 Biscaynne that can fly, are they banned from coming over too?
which N word was it?
'Nationalism' or the other one. Because more than one word starts with 'N'
any one can say it, anon. Most of us don't because we know what it does to people.
we have free speech and use it to not say that.
it has nothing to do with someone's choice of what to do on Saturdays.
It's OK to be a great and awesome soul who gets it, but don't be all stuck on yourself too.
that's not a cool word to use either.
it's raccoon.
the other one means more and it's easily misunderstood and you probably know that.
if he took the case higher how much higher would he have had to go? His rights were violated. Why doesn't he collect form the state of Conn for being a con and violating his rights?
oh no, instead he knukles under and lets them set a precidence. He should have stood up for his rights , and osmoene should have supported him. I agree with that.
but you say that he was OK saying that? I say he should have known that reptiles run that state and that they want to make those kids into mind slaves, and mostly have. and he could have said 'no, it stops with me' and got help and faught them. But no, he knuckled under.
what a dope. But he's stupid. He used a word that he should have known not to.
we all know this. WE don't take the bait of shills who want us to use those words. We know what 'they' are doing. This kid was a 'test case' to make it easier. He's probably compenstated for doing this.
or I'm wrong.
I support the right to free speech and part of that is knowing when to shut up.
also he's right that his rights are violated ,and he should sue all responsible. But he's still wrong for using that word.
I like labels. that is how I tell the spices appart in the jars easily, or know what is in the can or jar.
you got easily triggered
no, I said that someone should have backed up the boy and tken it all the way to the Supreme court! I didn't say that in such a forceful way.
I don't blame him. Conneticuit is a liberal wasteland. He took the easy way out.
And I certainly don't think he belongs in jail!
it's a system needing to be reformed and further his rights were violated.
but the logistics against going against the Liberal Inquisition for a boy like that mean that he had to capitulate. So ya, I don't really blame him for pussying out in that repsect.
seriously though we are on the same side: but I just see the real life situation as it is, some kid who didn't figure out that he's living in a state run by liberal hypocrites. He's being made an example of.
Why didn't anyone help him? You blame me? I'd have advised the lad to go to school somewhere else.
obviously you meant to say 'anon don't like labels attached to people or groups, living things'
I could disagree with that or agree.
but what I did was in a sarcastic way, I hope you got that (that's me being a sarcastic nitwit, seriously I know you did) so that you'd see 'oh, ya, labels for 'things' or stuff are kind of necessary.
in fact, markup is a kind of label. It is used to draw a page in a browser by the browser engine and provided by the post. It's a necessary thing. But too many labels all spalttered on top of each other might be hard to fathom. What could it mean?
so ya, labelling people is something that we maybe don't like.
but labels on stuff? kind of needed. Picture relates.
I read recently that the original Zion, the walled part of Jerusalem when it was newer, was only 17 acres.
but it was in a top part of a highland.