In a legal theory/analysis sense, any lawfag who objectively views this issue should realize that Roe v. Wade is nothing more than judicial activism, legislating from the bench, or whatever someone wants to call it. The decision is pure crap.
I realize that if it was overturned, the issue would fall to the states. But that decision legalized it nationwide and opened the door to the social conditioning bombardment upon society to actually make people think abortion is a natural right.
In a practical sense, it's interesting that with certain issues like abortion, hard evidence of corruption is lacking, mainly because it's not investigated, but gay wedding cake issues and Russian collusion allegations will be pursued until the target is ruined. Did you see the undercover videos about PP organ trafficking? Nurses have said that babies were murdered at PP after being born alive.
In a moral sense, stabbing a baby in the back of the head violates natural laws of survival of the species and care for the young, and it also violates the natural and positive law against murder.
You talk about restrictions imposed by authority on one's way of life. The courts have imposed upon a father that he has no say in whether his child is born or how he or she is raised.