100 moo joo posts per bread and crap and yet I am the slide trying to just do science.
I would love to show you the connection to the fractal to the right triangle.
it is there i just haven't found the way to express it yet.
Thank you
may take a minute but.
Just make a hyper cube computer That will figure out all possible options.
I get your perspective.
But I am way beyond EM - E requires no mass. M does require mass.
I am at the point mass is questionable - sorry.
Yes it is valid - but limited view.
no
chaos in Math is pattern we have no control of.
Your next step may be different than mine but i went to electron orbital patterns. I found the hopf hyperspere. Then I knew they geometry was classified.
four years ago.
That is part of the connection of Euclidean to fractal.
kwk
path
C squared
is a plane
It is also an array
in math
But c raised to 2 is a a fucking square.
Dude have to link the steps
You are talking rotational energy that most of physics ignores.
There is M zero energy -physical
there is velocity - relative to observer.
There is rotational energy that is a side note in physics.
Well …..
breakthrough not yet.
Well the difference is the above C relatively means beyond perception
It is all about POV and relativity is about perceiving a duality within the defined apace.
over C2 is beyond.
Who the fuck divide by zero
Well i gaee you the drops to think
up to you for a bit