>>7780101
Showing my age here but you people need this INFO..So you have some kinda understanding how long this has been happening ..And Its been happening a lot longer then before Clinton sold us out
Not All Foreign-Influence Scandals Are Created Equal
All about the AUMF
Rand Is Right; Lindsey’s Wrong: Limiting the President’s War Powers Is Patriotic
The Non-Delegation Conundrum
How McConnell Outplayed Pelosi
The Role of Skills in U.S. Immigration Policy, in One Chart
Susan Collins Working with Group of Republican Senators to Allow Impeachment Witnesses
Brexit: The Movie
UConn Student Receives Six-Month Probation, Mandatory Diversity Training for Using Racial Slur
Pro-Life Amicus Brief Reveals the Mendacity of the Pro-Choice Movement
Ocasio-Cortez Refuses to Pay DCCC Dues, Frustrating House Dems
Wages Soar Fastest among Those with the Least
Trump Promises ‘The Best Is Yet to Come!’ as Dow Hits New Record
Ilhan Omar Tries to Square Her Support for BDS Movement with Opposition to Iran Sanctions
Pelosi Relents, Plans to Send Impeachment Articles to Senate Next Week
The Long History of Blaine Amendment Bigotry
U.S. Adds 145,000 Jobs in December, Capping Ten-Year Stretch of Job Growth
Politics & Policy
Not All Foreign-Influence Scandals Are Created Equal
By John Fund
July 16, 2017 10:35 PM
President Bill Clinton with Al Gore at the 1996 Democratic Convention in Chicago (Reuters photo: Win McNamee)
Two decades ago, the media weren’t obsessed with Chinese interference in a presidential election.
This summer we mark the 20th anniversary of a major investigation by Congress of attempts by a hostile foreign power to influence an American presidential election.
I’m glad the news media is pursuing the Trump–Russia scandal, but let’s not forget the differences between how they are covering Russia compared with how they reported a similar story — this one involving Communist China — that developed during Bill Clinton’s 1996 reelection campaign. The Washington Post reported in 1998 that “evidence gathered in federal surveillance intercepts has indicated that the Chinese government planned to increase China’s influence in the U.S. political process in 1996.”
Many people still believe that a major cover-up of that scandal worked — in part because the media expressed skepticism and devoted only a fraction of resources they are spending on the Trump–Russia story. Network reporters expressed outright skepticism of the story, with many openly criticizing the late senator Fred Thompson, the chair of the Senate investigating committee, for wasting time and money. On June 17, 1997, Katie Couric, then the Today co-anchor, asked the Washington Post’s Bob Woodward about the story: “Are members of the media, do you think, Bob, too scandal-obsessed, looking for something at every corner?”
According to an analysis by the Media Research Center, the news coverage of the congressional hearings on the China scandal in the summer of 1997 were dwarfed by reports on the murder of fashion designer Gianni Versace and the death of Princess Diana.
The Chinese fundraising scandal involving DNC finance vice chairman John Huang first came to light in the final weeks of the 1996 presidential campaign. A former Commerce Department official, Huang was a top fundraiser who scooped up suspect foreign cash for Team Clinton.
A 1998 Senate Government Affairs Committee report on the scandal found “strong circumstantial evidence” that a great deal of foreign money had illegally entered the country in an attempt to influence the 1996 election. The DNC was forced to give back more than $2.8 million in illegal or improper donations from foreign nationals.
https://www.nationalreview.com/2017/07/chinese-illegally-donated-bill-clinton-reelection-campaign-media-downplayed/