>>7780377

So my observation that him selling out the United States tech industry to foreigners is simplistic, and your assertion that I'm wrong and I should do more research is not?

What did I say that was wrong? What did I say that triggered you to sperg out and whine that I didn't do his job for him? I don't know what the plan is, genius, I only know what he tells me. And if he tells me that he's for more immigration of "skilled workers" who I know aren't skilled, I am going to fucking call him out on it. I'm not a doormat. I will think for myself. If that triggers you, you're in the wrong place.

If you have something enlightening to say, by all means I'm all ears. If you're just going to say "I don't like it when you point out POTUS is doing something detrimental to the future of America", well tough shit.

I care more about this country than I care about any one person. If that's POTUS's response too, and I'm someone who he is willing to sacrifice for the country, so be it. Just have the balls to say it to my face.

>>7780454

Retarded take.

I'm hung up on Americans being replaced by foreigners who are building Chinese/Soveit/Stassi like social credit scoring systems in my country because they hate Americans, while considering themselves morally superior. I'm against foreigners who are actually shit at their jobs causing a decay in quality at every single tech company (look at Boeing, and Google for prime examples).

So seriously, go fuck yourself.

>>7780487

Except this has nothing to do with money, and everything to do with control over the tech industry.

Freer markets don't help when you can't fucking do anything because you're under surveillance by foreigners who fucking hate you and want you dead, genius. Have you read a fucking thing I've said?

>>7780504

I'm not asking for him to even specifically cite white people. I'm asking for him to stop playing the identity politics game altogether. That's what the ran on. That's what his base wants. If the racists of other races won't vote for him for that? Well then fuck them right? Or is their vote more important than integrity and pushing a true America First agenda?

I don't think what I'm saying is that controversial. I'm not asking for him to go white nationalist. I have never been a white nationalist, I've always been an American, and have always found the idea of "X-American" to be completely antithetical to what it means to be American. If, however, this is the "new normal", then at some point I will start to be a white American, and I will be fucking proud of it.

So again. I'm just asking for him to care about Americans, and pound his chest for Americans. If that's not possible or feasible? Fine. But then I'm not his target demo, and that's OK. I haven't had a person who has represented me in my lifetime. Being to the right of JFK will do that for you. I'm just sick of the lies.

>>7780811

>That is naive and unrealistic.

Fine. But at least admit what really set me off is him claiming that we need even more foreigners to come here and completely take over our tech industry, and displace all Americans like they have in education. Don't strawman my anger and say that I just went ballistic because he is playing his cards with Americans how he sees fit.

>Hang in there.

I have no choice.

>>7780882

We heard different things then. He kept saying that companies need more smart people, which only makes sense in the context of the conversation if he is defending more H1Bs/high skill immigration from abroad.

Considering what percentage of Google/Microsoft/Facebook/Amazon are foreigners (see: e.g., Google sharing AI tech with China that they won't share with the US government for "reasons"), I find your understanding dubious.

I'm not sure how else to understand his post otherwise, because as far as I can tell we need to immediately get rid of the vast majority of H1Bs who are currently here, because people are in serious danger if we don't (see: e.g., Boeing claims their planes are made by "clowns" and "monkeys").

I don't think my reaction is unreasonable in light of those facts, but am willing to listen to something more substantive if you have it.

>>7780882

>>7780899

I didn't mean "his post" I meant "his comments". Apparently I'm tired, kek.