>does this look like anons doing research on a Q board?
… asks the guy who has spent the whole bread calling Jim W a clown.
Despite his great performance at the Golden Globes, Gervais is a long way off being a conservative/patriot/anon.
"Ricky Gervais
@rickygervais
I’ve noticed a couple of tweets criticising me for “accepting” new followers who are the “opposite” of me. Christian, conservative, pro life, pro gun, reactionaries. Of course I accept them. To err is human, to forgive divine. It’s what Jesus would do. Dog Bless all my followers."
I'd say Gervais has started off as a typical celebrity - staunch leftist (anti-Christian, pro abortion, anti gun, progressive) and is ever-so-slowly waking up. Either that or he only cares about laughs and doesn't yet have the wisdom to incorporate those humorous thoughts into his every day philosophy. Let's hope it's the former and that many more are on a similar journey towards the light.
We should remember that one of his sharpest barbs was squarely directed at the Trump Administration. I think most anons agree that Jeffrey Epstein was murdered or is in witness protection. "Epstein didn't kill himself" is an indictment of Bill Barr's DOJ. Whatever happened to JE, it happened on Bill Barr's watch. And Barr claims he has seen the (now disappeared) tapes and the JE did kill himself. How stupid does the AG think we are? Food for thought.
What does Jim want us to do exactly?
Sounds like concernfagging.
Can anons do anything about Network Solutions?
Serious questions.