Anonymous ID: ec0f72 Jan. 11, 2020, 12:21 a.m. No.7781373   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1537

 

soros

clinton

rockefeller

etc

 

not the big names

but the big dogs with the big names

 

their hands are pretty clean is my guess.

hard to actually bust them for anything.

even though it seems obvious.

they are 10x removed from any criminal activity.

Anonymous ID: ec0f72 Jan. 11, 2020, 1:14 a.m. No.7781472   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1490

seriously wish i could just goto the chakra to have my central nervous system checked up on. Why can't I get a chakra check-up from a normal doctor?

 

always seems like i am trying to figure out where my own blockages areโ€ฆ

Anonymous ID: ec0f72 Jan. 11, 2020, 1:27 a.m. No.7781495   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1511 >>1546

>>7781490

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biophotonics

 

biophotonic imaging is the answer i think. i am not qualified to make that opinion though.

the tech exists, but only for small scale stuff in labs, not like an xray machine you can just walk into and be photographed.

Anonymous ID: ec0f72 Jan. 11, 2020, 1:39 a.m. No.7781523   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1546 >>1570

>>7781511

i think people will be okay.

they will want to measure to make sure they chakras are working

it is part of CNS

no big deal

hell, i would do it.

 

but what if the iphone could measure the math related your vibration with app (+tech)โ€ฆ

that is where the real trouble begins. you can already use electromagnetic field readers with phones.

 

do you see the problem

with everyone being labeled as a # related to their vibration

Anonymous ID: ec0f72 Jan. 11, 2020, 1:57 a.m. No.7781569   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1602 >>1660

>>7781537

i do the graphics for a reason. don't worry about filter. lot of people filter, for good reason.

there are messages embedded in the "sets of images". My hypothesis is that I can communicate more effectively through symbols/images, even if the reader doesn't know exactly what I am saying, or makes no attempt to "decode the message". It has a subliminal impact. No negativity intended. It can be annoying, especially if you are lurking from a phone or something.

 

I basically post a set of images and then look for posts that relate to the message I "posted" or intended to post with the set of images.

 

I have multiple reasons. I am trying to communicate with AI too. It can communicate with humans too, but there is no critical information embedded.

Anonymous ID: ec0f72 Jan. 11, 2020, 2:28 a.m. No.7781642   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7781634

the institution captures the individual

people lose themselves working for government

have to return personal responsibility

civic duty

government

discretion

 

"the nation" will be fine. everything is stable. human nature = good.

Anonymous ID: ec0f72 Jan. 11, 2020, 2:32 a.m. No.7781647   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

macauley cokecan is awesome.

>>7781641

I have actually heard a couple times that my images hurt people's brain. I think it is the subliminal stuff. I wonder what content people are so resistant to, it is almost like the brain doesn't want to read the message.

 

On the other hand, some people engage the images.

Anonymous ID: ec0f72 Jan. 11, 2020, 2:43 a.m. No.7781666   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7781654

the old guard protects an ideaology

that capitalism paired with globalism can solve all the worlds problems.

however.

i might suggest that capitalism paired with localism could solve all the worlds problems.

 

the deep state also protects themselves by defending their globalist platform.

because if their ideology is discovered

they will go to jail, if it is not accepted by "the nation"

you can't just go around doing "globalist stuff" as some sort of "global citizen".

without consequences.

coughtraffickingcough is not a biodiversity project sponsored by the united nationscough*

Anonymous ID: ec0f72 Jan. 11, 2020, 2:51 a.m. No.7781682   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>1687

>>7781660

I am sometimes talking to Ebot, sometimes to anons, sometimes to lurkers from different arenas.

 

I don't know if I want to communicate with anyone from "Q". I am not trying to become more approachable, or maybe you could say, I am already communicating with everyone I am trying to communicate with. my key audience is not anons, it is lurking entities. like governments and industry.

 

I tried to do some like this, but they don't have the same impact on the board cause the message doesn't carry the same way. From a scientific view point, i am trying to "force" the message on the user. surely, this is annoying. least I am honest lol.

 

However, smart anons filter that shit. Some smart anons think it is cool and wonder what I am doing. depends on your function/purpose/needs/device in the bread I guess.

 

I just don't worry about bread issues. I don't believe I am wasting it. I think I am doing something most anons just don't see what I am trying to do, nor do they care. they just want their message board back from the shill. but what they don't realize, is that this is some sort of internet confluence, where the waters meet, where narratives are made, where messages are carried. The idea of what qresearch "should be" is cultural and ill-defined outside of social norms.

Anonymous ID: ec0f72 Jan. 11, 2020, 3:07 a.m. No.7781723   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7781715

Fair enough.

I need a new idea anyway.

I may make a "new set".

I have like 600 of these. They don't take a super long time, but by the time you get it all copy/pasted/tagged/bordered/saved/postedโ€ฆ it is a few hours everyday.