>>7784049 (l/b)

>i did decide

>

>you are hopeless because your restrained from full view of reality by your narrow perspective granted through religion and belief

>

>that's why you hope and pray, because you don't really know anything, other than what you were taught (told) to believe.

>

>why Q theory works for you, no works no law just hope/faith

>

>more of the same is not different

Firstly, let me put to bed your assertion that "Q theory works for me." That is not necessarily the case. I am intrigued and supportive of the Socratic method that uses questions to engage the otherwise disengaged. I don't follow Q as though he/they/it were some kind of infallible oracle.

That aside: may I ask you a question or two?

Have you ever spent time thinking about how you came to be? How did you get here? There is necessarily a causal sequence of events that led to your existence. Have you given thought to whether you are a product of time and chance - ergo self-created, or whether you are a special creation? If the former, have you worked out that you are your own god and all religions that propose a higher god than self are necessarily usurpers? Conversely, have you given due consideration to the possibility that you are a created being and that your Creator may have some creatorship demands of you?

Have you ever considered what is truth?

Here's my definition: truth is the 100% accurate COMMUNICATION of facts where facts are what exists and what occurs (events) regardless of whether or not communicated. Thus, truth is a second order to facts - it is the accurate communiucation of same.

What I find missing from your rejoinders to my posts is any sense that you may have actually given time and thought to your posts. They seem to be reactionary as opposed to reasoned and considered.

Blessings, my friend.

>>7784229

Or perhaps it was an invitation to investigate any Trusts/Foundations involving these people?

But, ot course, you're far to intellectually challenged to consider the possibility of nuance or implication or concealed meaning - that would require the kind of thinking that a person who is compelled to write in red text and caps in an attempt to get their message across obviously lacks.

>>7784316

>if God has a purpose for me, than I'm apparently fulfilling that purpose as he is infallible right?

I'll just pick up this comment because it's not what I said. I proposed that if you are a created being your Creator may make some demands of you.I didn't speak of purpose (although I don't exclude that.) It's the right of a Creator to set the rules/parameters of that which he creates. It's about your/my obligation to a Creator; to know his nature and attributes and any requirements he may have of us. In so doing we will discover his purpose for us.