Thank you baker
Here are highlights from the end of Jim's video, after the radio show finished (https://youtu.be/lgC_1yQh68Q)
JW: "I'm concerned we're going to get the whole network turned off. It's super serious. I had 88 domains, that had nothing to do with anything, shut down yesterday… No reason other than they don't want to do business with me because of my Social Credit Score, basically."
"Let me read [their letter] to you: 'As part of our ongoing monitoring we are aware of the content on your website that is not in compliance with our Acceptable Use Policy… As such, we consider your continued use of our services a serious issue and a risk to our business and reputation, and formally request that you seek another registrar'."
"So Network Solutions is monitoring people's websites. This is not what they are supposed to do. But they can do that, because they are owning multiple corporations and controlling the entire industry."
"Well I brought this to an attorney, so we'll see what happens about it. But that 'one' [domain] that they want to shut down is not on their network, though they shut down 88 others that are on their network. They just want to see how much they can damage this person and take away his ability to make money. Because I'm not under 35 and can't get another job."
"That's what I was so upset about. This happened, and then some other things happened at the same time, and it was obviously orchestrated by multiple corporations that are owned by the same umbrella corp. Can I say 'umbrella corp?' I'm just gonna call it 'umbrella corp' - you know like in Resident Evil? They're from like 'Raccoon City'."
"They're one of the biggest companies on Earth. They have political reasons to shut us down."
(Repost from 7781413 which got lost in the shuffle last night. Looks like bun >>7783966 tried to include it, but accidentally pasted number 7780948 instead.)
>Can I say 'umbrella corp?' I'm just gonna call it 'umbrella corp'
Jim's phrase 'umbrella corp' seems to be important, as he repeats it several times, and relates it to Resident Evil and Raccoon City. Anons' theories?
>Because I'm not under 35 and can't get another job
He also may be hinting that we need to dig on the hiring systems that top companies use now, and how the secret Social Score is preventing most people over 35 from getting good jobs. Any anons in HR that can confirm and drop some names? Do big companies run all applicants through a specific software suite that we should dig into, or is all the applicant screening contracted out to a few third-party companies we should dig on?