>>7787785
>why is everybody that backs uo BO replying with first post?
dunno about "everybody" but I don't post often, only when something catches my eye
and I'm truly curious about your accusations
> he does not want to help in any way.
then you go on to say
>it took BO several days to make a minor change.
so… the time it took is a problem for you… OK
btw, it wasn't exactly a simple thing, it did take a bit of experimentation to figure out. experimentation that couldn't be done on this board without screwing things up even worse.
>and why the fuck would the many shill moves by BO from the past not be relevant anymore?
past actions have been corrected
>BO did a lot of fuckery and Jim and Ron just did not care (in fact they supported that much).
?
>Why is BO advertising a muh jew spam bread in other dedicated research threads in the war room post on top of every bread?
>Why is BO helping the fake muh jew narrative? Does he not know MSM uses this for attacks?
>Why is he refusing to even archive a bread with digs on masonry/illuminati?
that's not BO doing those things