>>7785295 (pb)

Juniper is only the beginning.

This has been going on for a very long time. They are typically sold as "maintenance", "update" "administrative" ports. Or not documented at all.

If you really want to scare yourself on how corrupt "data security" products are, look into checkpoint firewall. (reports of back doors all the way back to the 90's. Never fully confirmed. Always covered up with plausible deniability.). Rabbit hole goes deep and wide. founders, governments, and origins, are very interesting. Other security products they developed are some of the best surveillance and monitoring tools ever built.

>>7787983

Interesting how they keep the narrative that if you smoke pot you have been corrupted. Compromised or you are stupid. I know many technology folk that are cronic smokers and they are some of the best of what they do.

>>7788106

Foundations

Everything We Know so Far About Prince Harry and Meghan Markle's New Charity, Sussex Royal

In mid-June of 2019, Kensington Palace confirmed the rumors that had been swirling for weeks: the Duke and Duchess of Sussex are leaving the Royal Foundation, the charitable organization that they have shared with the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge. They plan to start their own separate charitable foundation, and it sounds like it will officially launch in 2020.

Here's everything we know about the project know so far:

During her speech at the launch of her charitable clothing line for Smart Works, Meghan shared that the fashion project is "the same vein of work my husband and I will continue doing—really strong, community-based projects—and this is something that we'll be excited to be able to share more about next year when we launch our foundation, Sussex Royal 2020."

Harry and Meghan are "very excited" to start their own charitable initiative.

https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a28171145/prince-harry-meghan-markle-charity-sussex-foundation-news/

>>7788120

Perfect example….Thank you! Brilliant work BTW.

>>7788114

That is a generalization and not an accurate statement at all. Again I know many people that smoke daily and they are not passive. What we are seeing here is conditioning. This is what they want you to "believe". If you understand the difference between placebo and nocebo this will make perfect sense. Layer upon layer we peel the distortion away.