Anonymous ID: 1cee0a Jan. 13, 2020, 1:52 a.m. No.7799298   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9302 >>9472

>>7799294

The Sun publishes photos of naked Prince Harry

THE SUN SAYS

23rd August 2012, 11:00 pm Updated: 6th April 2016, 2:58 am

TODAY The Sun is publishing the naked Prince Harry party pictures our readers

have been prevented from seeing in print.

 

We are doing so despite warnings from the Royal Familyโ€™s lawyers โ€” and weโ€™ll

explain why.

 

Before we do, letโ€™s be clear on one thing.

 

The Sun is NOT making any moral judgement about Harryโ€™s nude frolics

with girls in a Las Vegas hotel. Far from it. He often sails close to the

wind for a Royal โ€” but heโ€™s 27, single and a soldier. We like him.

 

We are publishing the photos because we think Sun readers have a right to see

them.

 

The reasons for that go beyond this one story.

 

The images were first published on the web three days ago. But the Palaceโ€™s

lawyers, via the Press Complaints Commission, warned the UKโ€™s newspapers

against printing them, claiming they would breach Harryโ€™s privacy and the

PCC Code.

 

Since then the entire UK media โ€” print, online and TV โ€” has reported on them

and told readers and viewers how to find them on TMZ.com, the website that

first published them, and on countless other sites that followed suit.

 

That coverage put those pictures a mouse-click away from anyone in the 77 per

cent of British households with internet access.

 

https://www.thesun.co.uk/archives/news/861237/the-sun-publishes-photos-of-naked-prince-harry/

Anonymous ID: 1cee0a Jan. 13, 2020, 2:04 a.m. No.7799327   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun   >>9334 >>9390

>>7799302

Dunno. But I remember thinking, back in 2012, wow. Someone is really trying to apply pressure to the royals. What happens in Vegas stays in Vegas. Unless you would make a good pawn in a game of global strategy that is. I beieve this is somehow related to keeping the British Monarchy in line concerning the Global War on Terrorism. Perhaps to prevent any pushback concerning justification of the invasion of Iraq. Don't get me wrong though. We are there now and POTUS can only play the cards he was dealt. I support 45 and am all in. Won't back out. Ever.

Anonymous ID: 1cee0a Jan. 13, 2020, 2:20 a.m. No.7799369   ๐Ÿ—„๏ธ.is ๐Ÿ”—kun

>>7799356

I guess it's possible. But what I really see as most likely is pressure being applied to the UK government for some reason at the time. Gotta remember the time frame here. This is about the time that noise about no weapons of mass destruction being found was reaching a crescendo.