>>7800674 Rats in a sack. Life is good.

>>7800578 A legit question is whether ANY of the alleged royals are royal in any sense. Have posited on the board that the Roths took over the British royal line after Waterloo & the unimaginable wealth that poured into their coffers, actually getting under the sheets with the existing blue bloods and instigating their own seed into all royal flesh. Think of Queen Victoria's brood spreading into the European royal houses. At some point though, that may have become a troublesome chore. So they would have placed actors in every position, while these legends in their own minds had plenty of time for partying and satanic games. This logic applies to all of the alleged royal lines in Europe. And elsewhere too, to some extent.

>>7800852 After Diana's death, QE2 gave a public talk about it. Praise for the dead woman, etc. Only reverse speech analysis revealed that Queenie, while praising Di in forward speech, said in reverse, which contains only truth that is subject to interpretation, "She needs this." Now a real queen, or her controllers, would not be pleased that Di did the adulterous dirty with a low born man, and would have been enraged that she bore his son. Then, for a divorced Di to have a very public affair with a rich muslim, quickly edging toward marriage, would be just too much. Not endorsing the Di kill here, just confirming it.

>>7800956 More bathhouse time for low IQ Corey.

>>7801136 o7