Indeed.
We've been rather constructive and do so from time to time. Some of us were explaining Iran, Operation Ajax, Operation Cyclone, etc waaaaaaay back on CBTS.
Only a few seemed to get it or care.
I suspect the "you can't say bad things about the jews" types are being somewhat intentionally obtuse and the smart ones pick up useful things when they see them without much fuss.
When board disruption is high, we simply export information into other avenues for collating into understanding.
Well, guilty as charged in terms of reddit posting. Phones and typing with thumbs tends to do that.
Interestingly, and I am certain this is sheer coincidence, I have a lot of difficulty posting to this board and my data connection will stall until a forced reset and dynamic IP cycled. I usually just pop in to check notables from time to time as I can usually only post once before the whole workings freeze up.
Ivanka?
Not necessarily.
Q is a more complicated subject than any one individual. The more you know about some of it (or at least suspect) the less you really want to say about it to the wrong people.
I will simply say I have been tangent to a number of things that lead me to believe I have a pretty good bead on who is "behind" Q. Of course, this is also to say that I see Q very differently than how most anons seem to, as I see government stations as being part of how "we" operate. I use that term arrogantly, as I can no longer truly consider myself subservient to a nation. Laws still apply, courts still have jurisdiction, and I certainly believe a sensible human being wants the best for the people he lives with and the governmental structures they use - but if you are or have been prepared to stand up and strike down your government, you've already internalized a personal ideal to judge nations by, and are no longer the same as someone who operates on classic concepts of identity and patriotism.
As for myself - one bad apple does not ruin the bunch.
Some subject themselves to a god. I do not. I subjected the claims of divinity to my pursuit of it - and found many claims substantially lacking. One should ask, in the story of Cain and Abel, what it was Abel held as flock, being the shepherd, and what it was he offered as sacrifice to please god.
One must then ask why it was Cain decided to kill his brother, as the farmer - wielding the scythe…
And why it is Q likes to use the skull - IE - the reaper.
The apple is the symbol for knowledge of good and evil. Some consider it a bad thing that it was eaten, as it was done in defiance of orders given - but crying over spilled milk is somewhat silly. Were Cain's actions evil, however?
Knowledge of good and evil means that there comes the opportunity to choose between good and evil. Consider the possibility that Cain's act was just and an embrace of the knowledge - which, being associated with the element of fire, craftsmanship, etc - one could say he embodies the concept of knowledge quite well. A sort of Prometheus.
If you are the sort who likes certainty, then the above is obviously a perilous journey through existentialism. If you're the type who enjoys questions and exploration, then stuff of that sort is absolutely tantalizing. Not all secret societies are as secret as they are made out to be, but their lines of teaching/question are kept quiet for a reason. Many people want simple instruction - and in that capacity, religion delivers… Many times for good. But all power draws corruption.