>>7810571 COINCIDENCE? Founding Member of Crowdstrike Securities Is Founder of Area 1 Security that is Pushing the โRussia hacked Burismaโ BS
BAKER, NOTABLE
>>7810571 COINCIDENCE? Founding Member of Crowdstrike Securities Is Founder of Area 1 Security that is Pushing the โRussia hacked Burismaโ BS
BAKER, NOTABLE
I see what you are trying to do - it's a good idea and will golden with a little bit of tweaking.
Suggestions
If you can extend the canvas (space outside of the image) and make the background black, that will give you room for some of the text, without putting it over her face
-Move "This will be the most" to very top center, 1st line, larger font size
-move "fairest witch-hunt in the" to center, 2nd line (also larger font)
-move history of Congress to top center, 3rd line (larger font)
-move "but" up a little higher, like at her upper cheek level and a few pixels to the left
make that you left baseline to align the rest:
No witnesses
No lawyers
No questions
move up and left align them (not center)
Hope that helps!
>The Great Awakening: Weโre living in a unique time in which ordinary citizens around the world are collaborating to understand and expose the corrupt system that rules us. The system thrives on deception, and the overwhelming task of The Great Awakening is to penetrate its lies and reveal the truth.
Correct, succinct and eloquent
Useful!
Much better. Thank you taking the suggestions in this spirit in which they were intended.
You will only get better and better!
Don't get discouraged! It's just part of the process. You can only get better now.
Will that convince any Berniebros?
Will that become popular with other liberals?
It will surely fire up Trump base, but they are already on POTUS' side.
What will help other liberals to at least get up on the fence?
Can confirm on all counts. There WAS something different about it. And it was different enough that I was in every thread - just in case it was real.
>But it's a cozy feeling when you read something, & get that flutter in your gut when you realize this could be the real deal.
Truly.
>But the only negative is that you don't ever really get that 100% confirmation that you were right.
I think that's why they asked for proofs to be made, as much as for us as for the public, that and the "mathematical impossibility" that has been repeated, to remind anons as well.
Having 'been here from the beginning' isn't something that makes one anon better than another, some just happened to be there at that time.