>>7952598

It all started with this one. All other crumbs are merely confirmations. You have to be ignoring the entire Q modus operandi to call this random. Yesterday Q revealed he was pointing out John Durham with a specific historical picture, post date and a single misspelled word! And you call this occurence random/larp and connect it to organizations like Gaia? Based on what facts? Ignoring to consider the vastness of space, like you know specifically we can dismiss this line of research? A good percentage of the awakening population has to be crazy with no apparent point of origin because the amount of people who believe in this stuff is staggering. All this predates Q so the only real argument here could be "LARP is piggybacking on New Agers" but we all know Q isn't one.

And stop calling people faggots for posting something you disagree with, it makes you look like an ass.

We can try to get Q to be a tad more specific about all this. So if everyone is tired of what looks like chasing fog there's always FOIA requests, Q&A's, and Tucker Carlson's twitter….

>>7952841

I'm sorry, even the phrase "new ager" has a connotation of the CIA psy-op. Maybe it's better to say "awakened people with extraterrestrial and spiritual awareness and intuition".

>>7953225

It's not obvious and true. It's a rabbit hole and this is a place to present those findings and conclusions. There is no proof that Q is an insider source either, does that stop you from believing in him? A series of coincidences goes a long way. Only those that seek shall find.

>>7953501

There is nothing I can prove to you because you have chosen your opinion and will defend it fiercely. Here's a small indicator of how widespread this "past life" thing is.