>>8566666

12 Experts Questioning the Coronavirus Panic

https://www.zerohedge.com/geopolitical/12-experts-question-covid-19-panic

———————————————————

It’s always interesting when there is a notable post on recurring numbers, as often pointed out by anons, digits confirmed.

What’s more interesting was this 66666 post was made on the 25th March, which is the 3rd 666 synchronicity I’ve bumped into for that date.

But to realize how significant this is, remember what are the chances of it landing on this date, and also the next time there are 666 digits equal to more than this.

8,566,666 + 10,000 = 8,576,666 (I.e less 6 digits)

8,566,666 + 100,000 = 8,666,666 (more 6 digits)

So anons will have to post another 100,000 times before we reach the next amount of 666’s.

So I think whenever we reach a recurring number as such, the information attached to it carry’s more weight than usual, because of synchronicity.

Also the fact that this post made it to the notables rather than was some random normal post makes it even more interesting. I.e what are the chances