Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 15, 2020, 9:55 a.m. No.7821706   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Idea to Remedy two tier systems in Justice:

Simple Law Revisions on [Fiduciary Trust] obligations.

 

Why is it that people who are in menaingful and trusted roles, e.g., Government, Law, Business, can 1) break the law 2) use their granted fiduciary positions, powers to [enable] do so, AND be held less accountable [justice] than someone who broke the law without ALSO violating a fiduciary responsibility.

 

'Fiduciary Trust Law' revisions should be effected to maximize penalties for those that break the law via (while) breaching fiduciary responsibilities.

 

In effect 'public servants' who have obligations/responsibilities to others have used their posiitons to commit crimes and when caught get off easier than an 'outsider' who had no fiduciary responsibilities which were violated.

 

Would max sense to triple damages, sentences (treble) for the base crimes when crimes are committed while holding a fiduciary role OR when the fiduciary role itself enabled or assisted in the commission of crime.

 

If you gave a key to a workman, who uses it to rob your house, he may not have breaking and entering as a charge, but the robbery/theft sentence should be increased three fold, due to violation of 'fiduciary' relationship.

 

All those who used their Government positions to defraud Potus and lied in testimony should be held accountable for the lies AND for violating their Fiduciary Obligations.

 

Please Opine and perhaps we can push some common sense ideas to prevent inflitration of Key Positions of Power to push agendas that conflict with the true Oaths of Office/Positions.

 

Politically who could publically oppose a Law/Bill that increased penalties [Deterrents] for people in a 'fiduciary' role of power who use that role to commit crimes?

 

Laws specifying penalties [Deterrents] for criminal actions obviously are not an effective counter measure against the Deep State modus operandi, they count on, and have been arguably successful in shielding their agents against accountability. A adequate adjustment to certain laws may make these DS agents, and 'pawns' less likely to aide and abet criminal enterprises if the current system of DS backed immunity is replaced by severe penalties for violating public trust 'Fiduciary'.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 15, 2020, 10:10 a.m. No.7821853   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Countering UN and Dems current/future plans for population control.

Their Plan:

 

Limit development outside urban centers, pack people into cities which they control with created division/conflict.

 

Solution:

Rural development push, solves the current housing affordability problems which are based in price of land (not construction costs). The high housing costs offest additional rural development costs when factoring in cheaper land. This creates a better quality of life, less population density (lower crime?) and environmental impacts are spread out from intenstity of mega cities, enabling nature to mitigate some effects.

 

'Rural Smart Development and Infrastructure Plan'

Protect and utilize our resources properly while enabling people to decide for themselves if they want to live in urban or rural environment.

Anonymous ID: 000000 Jan. 15, 2020, 10:13 a.m. No.7821882   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>1902

>>7821508

Wolf seems to be word of the week:

DHS Wolf

PA Gov Wolf sworn in

Navy buying Grey Wolf choppers

Wolf moon

Tweets about various Wolf/wolves (and dogs)

Just listening to comms.