all pb

>>7826596

>>7826632

>>7826683

In the 80s ('84 or '86, can't remember specifically) but there were 2 comets that just magically appeared, astronomers were not expecting them and were baffled. One comet went through a coronal mass ejection and emerged on the other side, perfectly intact.

Think about that for a moment.

It was described by at least one intel agency as " a shot across the bow" and everyone was very freaked about it.

That's when the aerial spraying really kicked into high gear to the extent that the sky would be totally occluded after spraying. I wondered at the time why that happened and I'm putting those 2 things together from my own experience, though they may not be connected at the highest levels, but it was weird to me at the time.

>>7826764

different baker taking over see >>7826767

>>7826828

>as a political favor.

And there ya go.

>>7826831

I didn't really finish my thoughts, but the implication was that "someone" was present who could 'throw' or 'propel' a comet through a solar flare and keep it intact and without it falling into the gravity of the sun, and it was a demonstration to our planet.

Panicked response was attempting to obscure certain areas of the globe at different times.

So, the hypothesis that some seriously advanced tech may be used here shortly when the proverbial noose tightens a lot more seems very plausible to me.

>>7826777

Kek wills continual winning!

>>7826871

It's so striking but also calm at the same time. I've got some more up my sleeves :)

>>7826909

Yes. >>7826867

>>7826869

Good job, anon. I know it's frustrating when effort-posts are totally ignored. I'm not sure what to do with it atm.

>>7827052

Nicely put, thank you.

>>7827065

Very true.

>>7827070

>What are GPS tracking units?

>How tiny can they be with present technology?

In the movie The Recruit, there was one so small and transparent (sticky back like a band-aid) it was stuck onto someone's jacket shoulder and it was virtually unnoticeable.

breddy gud movie too

>>7827096

>>7827127

They are all on the spreadsheet, too. Both direct link to thread and also the thread itself is archived and the link will go to that specific post on the archive link. Also there are screenshots in their own gallery, by month.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Efm2AcuMJ7whuuB6T7ouOIwrE_9S-1vDJLAXIVPZU2g

>>7827125

I still use qcodefag's site. I like it a lot better than the other ones - nothing but Q posts.

>>7827171 (NABU) to launch a probe into seizure of government power and corruption suspicions. (names OBAMA!)

BAKER, NOTABLE

>>7827221

>>7827225

Publishing this on ZH has crossed a very significant threshold. This site gets ridiculous traffic, so first they reposted from some person's blog an entire long Q post, with no comment), and now this positive Q article. Wow.