I hadn't heard of this before:
The Q source (also called Q document, Q Gospel, or Q from German: Quelle, meaning "source") is a hypothetical written collection of primarily Jesus' sayings (logia). Q is part of the common material found in the Gospels of Matthew and Luke but not in the Gospel of Mark. According to this hypothesis, this material was drawn from the early Church's oral tradition.
It's just a theory I came across on Wikipaedia. I didn't write it and never posted it before. Not sure what to make of it, but apparently it got a shill's attention. Thanks for noticing.
"Along with Marcan priority, Q was hypothesized by 1900, and is one of the foundations of most modern gospel scholarship.[4] B. H. Streeter formulated a widely accepted view of Q: that it was written in Koine Greek; that most of its contents appear in Matthew, in Luke, or in both; and that Luke more often preserves the text's original order than Matthew. In the two-source hypothesis, the three-source hypothesis and the Q+/Papias hypothesis, Matthew and Luke both used Mark and Q as sources. Some scholars have postulated that Q is actually a plurality of sources, some written and some oral.[5] Others have attempted to determine the stages in which Q was composed.[6]"
There are a lot of sources cited. All of them pre-date the arrival of Q. Rather interesting that the Q gospel theory includes a Q+. Probably interesting to anyone except a shill. I mean it's a "coincidence" at the very least. :)
For example, Michael Goulder, "Is Q a Juggernaut", Journal of Biblical Literature 115 (1996), pp. 667–81, reproduced at "Archived copy". Archived from the original on July 8, 2007. Retrieved July 17, 2007.
Hmmm….Did Q help to write the Bible?
Time travel is a thing, after all.
Time, space, matter. All energy. All the stuff of God.