Anonymous ID: 8e0dd6 Jan. 16, 2020, 5:13 p.m. No.7834443   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>4493 >>4511

I'm sure someone has already brought this up - but since I don't see a mention of it in notables (recent), I'll bring it up just to be sure.

 

Did we misread Q 1424? Or more likely, are we missing a 2nd meaning?

 

Follow the PEN.

Think timing.

Coincidence?

The attacks will only get worse.

They are losing [all] control.

Q

Anonymous ID: 8e0dd6 Jan. 16, 2020, 5:25 p.m. No.7834538   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7834511

Another possibility - but I don't (personally) think so.

 

>Follow the PEN.

obvious interpretation to pen(s) signing the articles.

 

>Think timing.

same day as USMCA?

Right before Primary season begins?

Project Veritas&Bernie?

 

>Coincidence?

No coincidences.

 

>The attacks will only get worse.

Bullet shaped? Attacks will only get worse indeed…

 

>They are losing [all] control.

Possibly misinterpreted losing control to be losing control politically. Could quite easily (and plausibly) be interpreted as losing control of themselves - or of their minions. Bernie's staffers certainly are out of control at the very least.

 

>Q

Anonymous ID: 8e0dd6 Jan. 16, 2020, 5:34 p.m. No.7834614   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7834597

it's a nice idea

but no.

Pelosi's district is so deep blue (legit or via voter fraud doesn't really matter at this point) that a cockroach with a D painted on it's back could win over nearly any Republican candidate.