Anonymous ID: 368d3e Jan. 17, 2020, 1:21 a.m. No.7837202   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7206 >>7211 >>7215 >>7218 >>7223 >>7287 >>7296 >>7324 >>7541 >>7669

Lawyers for Ghislaine Maxwell and Virginia Giuffre appear in court to hash out plan to unseal documents that name MORE high profile individuals connected to Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring

(Jan 16 2020)

The non-parties are to be notified in two weeks, Judge Preska said. Once the non-parties respond, Maxwell and Giuffre’s legal teams will be able to file their oppositions.

 

Sigrid McCawley, attorney for Giuffre, raised the issue that the next document dump of material would be reflect badly on her client as ‘Maxwell is not objecting to any items that could be negative to Virginia’.

 

Preska said that she no reason for documents to be withheld ‘to which there is no countervailing interest’ and said they should be released ‘ASAP’.

 

There is no set date on when the next document dump will be, other than in the ‘near future’.

 

McCawley said the next step was that the non-parties would be notified in two weeks and ‘get a two-week period to file an objection if they so want’.

 

‘The Judge will be reviewing those, assessing what she is allowing Maxwell to do which is set forth countervailing interests.’

 

McCawley said that that 'might be where the battle lies' because Maxwell has set forth an extensive list of reasons why these documents should not be released.

 

‘We will argue against that,’ she added.

 

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7896171/Lawyers-Ghislaine-Maxwell-Virginia-Giuffre-hash-plan-release-docs.html

Anonymous ID: 368d3e Jan. 17, 2020, 1:31 a.m. No.7837225   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7837218

>does anyone have the sauce on the 2000+ pages that were blocked from admission though?

 

I think those were from a previous case that was settled. Due to that case being settled, with some agreement between parties, the doc's entered in THAT case were deemed not automatically subject to the presumption of public access.

 

They may well be released in this current case though, once the process for categorising them is agreed.

 

See Jan 13 entry:

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwell/?order_by=desc

Anonymous ID: 368d3e Jan. 17, 2020, 2:57 a.m. No.7837402   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>7408 >>7414 >>7419 >>7541 >>7669

'''Luxury yachts caught smuggling Chinese immigrants into Florida, federal investigators say

Authorities seize hundreds of thousands of dollars in alleged scheme to bring people into US from Bahamas'''

 

Forty Chinese immigrants were charged thousands of dollars to be smuggled in yachts from the Bahamas into Florida, according to federal court documents that allege a scheme involving luxury liners ferrying passengers into the country without legal permission to enter the US.

Three men are facing human smuggling charges outlined in federal indictments filed this month.

Rocco Oppedisano is accused of piloting a 63-foot Sunseeker yacht named INXS Finally with 14 Chinese passengers and one Bahamian aboard during a December voyage, according to a federal indictment filed on 7 January, according to the Miami Herald.

 

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/china-bahamas-human-trafficking-smuggling-yachts-florida-a9287741.html

 

https://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/article239325343.html