>>7838771
I am not the one who posted that.
Believe me or not, I'm not the one.
BO could confirm, if he was here.
Why should I reply to my own post saying that "we knew that already, WI-38"?
>How do you keep that giant ego fed?
Are you stupid, or something?
I already told you, I'm not the one who posted it, but at the same time I think it should have gotten mentioned specifically.
You see, I see tons of dupes all the time. Do I have a problem with dupes? No, I don't.
I have missed it before and would have missed it once again because of the silly name of the notable. I'm actually the anon who made most of the Pharma Research bread. I would have posted it already in there, if it would have been my post, okay?