>>7839262 (pb)

1 + 1 = 2

2 + 2 = 4

4 + 4 = 8

8 + 8 = 16 -1 + 6 = 7

16 + 16 = 32 -3 + 2 = 5

32 + 32 = 64 -6 + 4 = 10 = 1

64 + 64 = 128 -1 + 2 + 8 = 11 -> 1 + 1 = 2

And so on.

It loops.

1 -2 -> 4 -> 8 -> 7 -> 5

Vortex math.

Missing special numbers 0, 3, 6, 9

>>7839317

The journal link doesn't work.

Weird.

Also found that article here:

https://www.sciencecodex.com/low-doses-radiation-used-medical-imaging-lead-mutations-cell-cultures-638626

>>7839317

>>7839418

Found the sauce:

Link is broken in original article.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1008550

https://journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/article?id=10.1371/journal.pgen.1008550

Low dose ionizing radiation strongly stimulates insertional mutagenesis in a γH2AX dependent manner

>>7839596

It explicitly says:

https://www.sciencecodex.com/low-doses-radiation-used-medical-imaging-lead-mutations-cell-cultures-638626

…

While the new results in cell cultures are potentially concerning, the study's authors stress that translating radiation's effects on lab-grown cell cultures to effects in the body is premature. Future experiments using animal models will be necessary to determine the full effects of low-dose radiation, and whether its use in medical imaging has an impact on patient health. If the same phenomenon does occur inside the body, then doctors may need to take into account levels of extraneous DNA, such those resulting from a long-term viral infection, when assessing a patient's risk from a procedure that requires radiation.

…

That study is a start only.

>>7839317

>>7839558

>>7839808

Baker, please add this post.

I attached the PDF of the study (Low Doses of Radiation). Forgot to do it.