>>7840845

Thank you, bakerer.

>>7840966

>i wonder if some women have always been predisposed to exposing themselves for attention

Yes, but the standard used to be letting a flash of ankle show.

A hundred years ago, the thought of a shapely ankle filled many a long night.

>>7841028

>Our Founders would be considered glowing today,

100% correct. Most of them were Masons

>>7841148

>>7841199

>What if someone declared a rally, but nobody showed? (Or went somewhere else with lots of press and no antifa) This could be played very well if there were some simple planning in place beforehand. Will the constitutionalists knee-jerk, or plot?

>>7841248

Imagine having to feed Barron. I bet that kid can wolf down five thousand calories a day.

SS anon here

Barron got caught looking at baker girls, and FLOTUS grounded him from the computer. That's why Q has been silent so long.

Barron is asking if one of you fags is brave enough to post a petition on the WH site for FLOTUS to give him computer privileges back.

>>7841525

>Hey Barron.. Ask mom if you can wear some dark shades in your next TV appearance.

>2 Pair?

>Waring a pair and holding a pair.

>That'll warp some brains.

Kek. The media would lose their shit, FLOTUS could scold them again, and anons would have a sensible chuckle.

>>7841499

That escalated quickly.