'weak mind'
filtering is filtering.
it has nothing to do with 'weak'
those who attribute a quality of person to this use of a tactic to put down those who do censorship-through-information-overload: filtering them is fine because all they do if fill the pages with bad content, and add nothing.
There is nothing weak about filtering them. It's a strong move.
but you don't care you just want the poison messages to get through.
the 'alpha beta' dichotomy is a weak minded concept pushed by division fags.
who are quick to badger, like you do.
the 'alpha' is observed t be the 'better' male. however, both are fine. there is no difference. It's merely the role that they play. When they are in that 'i am better, you are less' game, and don't love and respect their comrades as equals, they say 'I am alpha, now suck my dick', like you do now.
that's not saying that you don't have fun. And the guy who you get to do it for you probably likes it too. But the secret wish of the 'sexual alpha' is the sex. And in the game that they play, wrestling with same-sex strangers, the end is usually a 'happy ending' with both of them willing.
so just admit it, you were once someones conquest. They said 'i am the alpha you are the beta' you had great sex with this. you were their little conquest and loved it.
and now you are hoping for that again, trying to bait soeone into a battle so you can lose to them and be the bottom, or beta.
that's fine. you are young and healthy and need to do what you or you'll have to change your sheets too much.
you went there.
telling you that the 'alpha/beta' talking point about male sexuality is a bullshit one isn't 'attacking you'. The idea that you are an 'alpha' is a bad one for you because it makes you into an ego narcisscist and you give up a lot of opportunity by sexualizing the underpinnings of all your male-male relationships.
I'm trying to make you see that you are equal to those who you claim dominance over.
I'm not trying to dominate you, I'm trying to give you some truth to free from a fallacy.
start? finish?
we help each other.
you understand why I 'started' something.
I noticed that you have a point of view that seems to be that you want to be the 'dominant' and sexualize your male-male relationships with this 'alpha beta' bullshit.
now you are confused because I got to the heart of it. you maybe feel a little shame because I was pegging you with dead-on accuracy.
now you can see the other men around you as equals and maybe you'll have more meaningful relationships. Sounds like maybe I'm being a mentor to you and you resent it because it doesn't end up in a sexual encounter with you getting . . .
but that's fine. the more you don't do that the better it will be the next time it actually happens.
stop thinking in sexual metaphors about your male-male relationships!
It's OK to have an ego anon.
It's not ok to see you awesome young man whose not yet at that place of blooming with confidence and say 'Oh i'm the alpha and I will have my way with you'.
you started it with the 'get off my dick' reference.
it's OK anon. I'm not really attacking you, as you say.
the other thing: you need to be able to follow means to recognize when you might learn from others and letting them teach you things.
and then you can teach them how to be cocky confident braggart who gets the attention of others and makes them fantasize about pleasing them (not sexually) to have a new and awesome top-dog friend who will show you how to do some cool stuff that you know.
It's OK to be awesome. It's not OK to say 'I am the most awesome and dominant'
a team needs many players.
in your view, and maybe you don't know this, you pull up all the fresh seedlings as being too immature yet.
but if you let them grow they will turn into full fledge fully formed creatures who are transforming with blooming that you didn't expect.
you deflect from the awareness of your sexual gaming here.
that's OK.
fuck your 'you try to program me' bullshit.
I am saying: dominance is not an absolute quality but a behavior within a certain situation.
the one who can display this behavior is a good manager, and leader, and needs to know how to play that, be that for the ones in their charge.
sexualizing it, or thinking that it applies for all things and all skillsets, is a flaw of the 'awesome ones' who can be the 'manager' and still maintain an effective office/crew/team.
and the sexualizing of it is one of the flaws of the dominant and how they are 'taken out' by bad people who attack the organization.
'dominant' is a 'place' in your 'skillset' that you pass from later on, someone else comes along, they are better at some things.
and see how you got to this place where you say I was trying to be your master.
you're back that 'slave/slaver' place.
can't we all just be free in your view? aren't you here to free people? If you have a fallacy that dominates your relationships, wouldn't it be wonderful if you can see through it earlier in life?
the 'master/slave' 'dominatate/submissive' are roles in a game. Many times it's a sick game. othertimes it's a diversion and a romp.
so you were looking for a master. I kind of knew that.
the people who play the 'slave/master' sex game and talk that talk usually will play both roles. I know this. you probably do too.
carry one and yes, I do care that you get past it but I know you'll chest thump me another back-at-cha, thinking that I've been badgering you.
PS: if you've made me master : master frees you.