>>7850752 pb
>salacious pics of Schiff to be released?
Would sure make the dull Senate proceedings a lot livelier….
(but will Tom Shillue be willing to do a parody?)
>>7850752 pb
>salacious pics of Schiff to be released?
Would sure make the dull Senate proceedings a lot livelier….
(but will Tom Shillue be willing to do a parody?)
>ANONS are selfless, nameless, faceless, fameless, and FEARLESS.
A worthy ideal.
No anon–or person–is that perfect.
We each do what we can with what we have.
too cynical a pov. let it go, fren. board doesn't have to be perfect to be powerful. neither do u.
one observation: if yr fueled by anger, that a negative motivation. what would it be like to have a positive motivation–to become fueled by a love of country, POTUS, etc? just a thought…..
>something to gain
so do some anons
some feel "special" coz
anon
name or no name doesn't matter
look inside the heart
baker here, yes i call out things too, but do not call bakers–or anybody–clowns. not necessary and sounds conspiratorial. no baker is perfect. calling out behavior gud, leave the rest. just my two cents worth.
agree, thx for the sanity.
understand. but try attuning to a person when in a quiet space and see what comes back. remain neutral for best results.
yes, rage is powerful. but rather like a demon too as all those who anger well know.
nice to have the caps anon but they are limited without the original posts they reference–which is probably why bakers removed them. easy to find them elsewhere.
blame ron and vanwa for q posts growing green? instead, ask BO to have moar breads on the board–it took off 40% of them around early june i think it was, maybe he'll put them back. post request in /meta/.
sorry, wrong addressee. like ur post, tho.
>useless faggot
was in the past. sounding meek these days–could test that with a request like this.
@fj definitely announced he was eliminating a lot of breds off the catalog one day, nothing about bandwidth mentioned as i recall. just his decision. if any anon remembers otherwise, plz say.