>>7850929 (PB)

Didn't say WHO has the photos. Doesn't have them. Not noteworthy without more to back it up ... at present is nothing more than a wild accusation -- and those are a dime a dozen and usually splatter back on the accuser and any who trusted him.

Un-uh

>>7851461 (PB)

>to see if any new posts

Well, there's your answer … Q hasn't posted in long enough that the previous posts have aged out. When there IS a new one, it'll be in the accustomed place.

>>7852196 (PB)

Read VRE in HS (eggheads book study at lunch – also tackled Dante's Inferno for yucks – I hung with some strange people!) and can heartily recommend it. Thanks for the reminder … HS was 50 years ago and it's probably time for a review. ;-)