>>7862303

>>7862424

NEWFAGS,

Anons are attacked by muh jew shills constantly.

THIS IS AN EFFORD TO FRAME Q AS A NAZI MOVEMENT AND MAKE THE FAKE NEWS ATTACKS WORK.

There are two kinds of muh jew shills.

1 - glowing ones using nose images and saying kike and rabbi in every post.

2 - blended in ones (replying to concern shills) and using (((echos))) to create a "people vs jews" narrativ.

<DS wants the people divided

Don´t fall for it.

MUH JEW TACTIC:

<Look here: joooos, only joooos, every joooo

<Do NOT look here: worldwide illuminati DS, ruling families, Freemasons, other masonic orders, Killary+Hussein+Administration, China ,SA, Iran, global terrorism, thinktanks, political advisers, actors, musicians, judges, doctors, fake news reporters, …

If it is that simple like

<muh jooos

why do we even have a research board?

>>7862496

Problems = internal!

some info on Jim and Ron:

• they met with controlled opposition clowns of other boards

• Jim gave an interview to a clown and claimed he had never heard of the Q movement (the one that brought huge traffic to his site, being the reason for his son Ron to update the servers often)

• Jim Watkins has two names - he did earlier 'news' (also controlled opposition) as Jim Cherney - who the fuck has two names if not a spook??

• they obviously support a clown as board owner

see:

>>7768030 pb

>>7768066 pb

>>7768095 pb

>>7768170 pb

>>7768207 pb

Why would Jim still be doing business with Fred Brennan, if he was the person responsible for 8chan takedown? - it´s all fake, they are clowns!

>>7799769 pb

>>7862594

so that tells that indeed Jim and Ron made a mistake - hence, this info should be spread.

Would a based BO and a based team running/owning this board/site try to help?

Would patriots at least be around?

Would clowns try to be available for inquiring minds as little as possible?

>>7862711

The info that Jim and Ron work with Fred Brennan, the one who (according to Jim and Ron) took down 8chan. Why the fuck would they hire him as adviser??? Why would they still work with him???

Jim and Ron are clowns, there are many obvious facts for them being controlled opposition.

The fact that they took down the info re Fred is basically a confirmation that they know this glows.

>>7862801

he was listed as advisor, only think you know it that he is not listed anymore.

and why were they working with him in the first place after he took down the site???

>>7862842

Nope.

All the clown moves on Jim and Ron do not dissapear only bc you mention 40,000 ft view.

Jim gave an interview to a clown, the only interview after 8chan takedown. He claimed he had not heard of Q in that interview. They work with the guy that took 8chan down - WHY?

They met the controlled opposition clown owner of 4chan.

Jim even has a second name, Jim Cherney.

They. Are. Clowns.

>>7862872

Jim and Ron are controleld opposition clowns and are forced to glow hard.

>>7862891

right before Jim made the "oh no, site will go down" announcment (global notable) he, Ron and BO were called out bigly and started to glow with much facts on them being clowns.

see:

>>7768030 pb

>>7768066 pb

>>7768095 pb

>>7768170 pb

>>7768207 pb

>>7799769 pb

>>7862930

fake.

>>7862935

you clowns try this pasta again?

seriously?

pb baker took a post from a 25-post-clown that posted the notable post 3 times in the bread and also posted this?

all pb:

>>7691089 lol lol lol

>>7691160, >>7691188, >>7691441 filling the bread with mostly bs memes (included as 'tactic used by shills' in his own post!!)

>>7691258 bs, btw, this is exactly how Anjel posts…

>>7691374 lol lol lol

This clown just glows.

And tbh I can not believe that a based baker takes this as notable…

post in notable

>>7691143

This post names many known and obvious clown tactics and mixes them with what anons post.

This was done earlier when "muh jews" and "muh masons" were posted by clown as 'shill tactics' - while muh jew obviously glows it´s not "muh masons shilling" when research and info on the actual cult and dark religion are posted.

But this post also tried to make other legit work of anons look like clowns - the same topics that are attacked by the clowns since a long time:

>… be wary of clockfags/codefags(they rarely work or even make sense)

Q asked anons to build a clock, this works amazingly well and it was notable hundreds of times with amazing coinkinks. (it makes clowns butthurt bc it shows how well planned this all is.)

>… Ignore muh Jews/joos/goy, muh Masons, muh whatever(facts prove guilt…not preconceived opinions)

Digging on the masonic / illuminati deepstate, their symbolism and persons is not shilling, but what anons do on this board.

>… Totally disregard "Codemonkey, Jim, Bo, Q is a shill"(whilst typing on the website provided by their dedication)

This I believe is the very reason this post was made at all. BO is never around anymore, got rid of his BVs, it takes him weeks to make minor needed fixes, he does not check bakers at all, leading to many clown bakers.

many anons call this out, which is obviously legit, and many anons assume BO is a controlled opposition clown.

>… Do they post the same shitty copy/paste memes about "beware of shills"

I try to make a post of "see the shills" in as much breads as I can.

This posts triggeres shills since a long time.

So now shills make a pasta and ask to use often and share wide, to include in this "beware of pasta', bc a specific one triggeres them?? topkek.

Also this post tries to make anons filter ID+ instead of ID, which leads to filtering every anon that replies to one clown post.

>If you think the room is getting too retarded, then use filter +

Post also says

>Scroll or Filter

>Just an opinion… Take it or leave it…

and at the same time screams

<Filter ruthlessly and fast.

<Filter fucking ruthlessly!

…kek…FAIL!

Imo this post was only done to make it look like the "true brave shill fighters" just love BO.

Do they really like BO not being around anymore? Do they like never ever seeing a BV post? Did they think always someone from board admin lurking and fixing problems in the past was a bad thing? Seriously?

Fact: BO starts to glow. This post only proves.

same ID posted:

>>7690968 Thank you Ron, Jim, team

>>7862938

>Unofficial Official

???

How can there anything close to that on a free speech board?

Do you speek for other anons?

Is there any ANON that speeks for anybody but himself?

How would you make sure this account does not spread the bs that BO and his clown crew try to force upon this board?

This smells like a clown move big time.

If not, it´s a really bad idea.

Spread the info you like about QR, post notables and Q drops, whatever you like, but never be claiming to speak for the board.

>>7862980

there is a BO, ih he would be based he could use his twatter to push admin stuff. but as he never even shows up on this board it´s unlikely that he would do that.

again, nobody can speek for "the anons" on QR. post whatever you like, but do not claim to have "the RQ account" - this makes you look like a clown.

>>7862990

there were no such posts, clown.

and when Q dropped the bpard was starting to work better, after having had much trouble before.

if you try to spread bs, at least try harder.

>>7863000

so you have no argument at all for this very shilly looking idea, and all you can say is call me a shill?

you failed already.

anons are anon.

there is no account speaking for other anons.

if BO would care for the board, he obviously could use his twatter to spread admin stuff.

but he doesn´t, and Ron and Jim neither speak up on the issues right now.

>>7863016

fuck off disinfo clown.

don´t even know why you spead this irrelevant bs.

the board having trouble was not related to baker change and also did not coincidentally fit time wise.

>>7863009

<we

?

speak for yourself.

this anon right here wants Q to grow!

>>7863193

oh, maybe should add. an account that speakes for all anons here is a terrible and most likely shilly idea.

but anons want the Q movement to grow and Q wants newfags!!