Anonymous ID: 3050fa Jan. 20, 2020, 5:24 p.m. No.7863358   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3420 >>3495

>>7863341

>>7863350

NO!

Don't refresh, it fucks things up.

ONLY refresh if the bread doesn't have [Post a Reply] at the bottom.

Just press [Update] a bunch of times to get it to update.

Refreshing many times will refresh the bread's OP and MAYBE another few posts, but will load all the rest later.

Refreshing fucked me up a few times.

Anonymous ID: 3050fa Jan. 20, 2020, 5:34 p.m. No.7863413   🗄️.is 🔗kun

The following members of House of Representatives will be joining @realDonaldTrump 's impeachment team:

 

@Jim_Jordan

@RepMarkMeadows

@RepRatcliffe

@EliseStefanik

@RepLeeZeldin

@RepMikeJohnson

@RepDLesko

@RepDougCollins

 

https://twitter.com/SaraCarterDC/status/1219432075759058944

Anonymous ID: 3050fa Jan. 20, 2020, 6:39 p.m. No.7863711   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3716

>>7863703

Markers are just words, numbers, phrases, people, places, etc that are highlighted by Q.

What they mean is a different question.

For example numbers in brackets such as [0] refer to deltas. [#2] refers to McCabe. Some aren't that straight forward though.

Anonymous ID: 3050fa Jan. 20, 2020, 6:44 p.m. No.7863737   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3754

>>7863716

What do you mean?

Read the crumbs with "Marker(s)" in them. Q defined this early on.

Got a nice graphic coming about markers for deltas, aka colloquially delta markers.

imo a marker is usually in brackets which is used to make note of it for future or incoming use.

Anonymous ID: 3050fa Jan. 20, 2020, 6:58 p.m. No.7863799   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>3815

>>7863754

Again, reread crumbs about markers.

There are some markers that are not in killboxes (brackets used to emphasis to note what's inside it), but many are. Number markers having to do with deltas are certainly one of those markers within brackets.

Anonymous ID: 3050fa Jan. 20, 2020, 7:26 p.m. No.7863918   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7863904

>assuming

It's not so much of an assumption, it's more an evaluation of the evidence I have. But we need the Space Force legitimately 1) for Russia/China and 2) because space related offense and defense needs funding and it would've never gotten it in NASA

Anonymous ID: 3050fa Jan. 20, 2020, 7:33 p.m. No.7863946   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7863938

Actually baker that's not ALL the tweets, there's a retweet I didn't add and some that were deleted from the other night. But it's fine for now, just change the title next bread please, thanks!