>>786807

What is a big upside, when the military is building the border wall?

Building this wall will be attacked by activists and the dems.

Civil contractors would have been stalled by them.

But not the military

>>786857

Leftist activists, occupying French university have been driven out by force through masked and hooded men:

http:// www.breitbart.com/london/

>>786919

And what could activists, protestors and saboteurs achieve against the US army?

They will be unable to hinder the army to build the wall.

>>786974

Here's something, I deem notable:

Why did Trump chose the Army Corps of Engineers for building the wall?

Because he knows that the construction work will be attacked by activists, dems and saboteurs.

This now means that these people would attack the army.

Attacking the army is unlawful.

Who better to defend itself than the army?

>>786998

Yes!

>>787015

spelling error

>>787031

This is one reason, why Trump chose the army.

Hindering the army or to saboteur them (or the army's construction = the wall), could bring them in jail.

>>787042

More like "certain jail time".