Anonymous ID: 10541f Jan. 21, 2020, 1:59 a.m. No.7865182   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5413

Urinalism…KEK! Cheers to the Anon that contributed this meme…Perfection!

 

New York Times aka The Al-Qaeda Times, Treason Central-Times, Terrorist Tipping Times….Has a long history of Anti-American Behavior and should be prosecuted….

 

The New York Times and Iran: The New York Times has been criticized for helping terrorists in the past by disclosing investigatory methods and rendition policies and practices, supporting them in its editorial pages and allowing terror suspects to spin their stories in the news section, disclosing methods our nation has used to prevent funds from reaching terrorists, condemned the existence of prisons holding terrorists, criticizing the laws brought to bear to prevent terrorism, and whitewashing or apologizing for terror when it occurs.

 

The Worst of (the) Times. It has become more and more transparent that the New York Times leans not only left, but far enough away from mainstream America so as to reach out to our enemies in the War on Terror.

 

The terrorist Tipping Times: The New York Times (proudly publishing all the secrets unfit to spill since 9/11) and their reckless anonymous sources (come out, come out, you cowards) tipped off terrorists to America's efforts to track their financial activities. Guess what? It isn't the first time blabbermouth journalists have jeopardized terror-financing investigations since Sept. 11, according to the government

 

The Al-Qaeda Times: You could call it "Treason Central," or "al Qaeda West," but no matter what you call it, the building housing the once-august New York Times at 229 West 43rd St. in New York City is a beehive of anti-American hostility, where selling out the nation's secrets has become the newspaper's stock in trade.

 

All the News That's Fit to Prosecute. The congressional rebuke of the paper makes it clear that the American people, speaking through their representatives, are more distressed by the help given to al Qaeda by the Times than by some purely hypothetical danger to civil liberties.

 

The New York Times is a national security threat. So drunk is it on its own power and so antagonistic to the Bush administration that it will expose every classified antiterror program it finds out about, no matter how legal the program, how carefully crafted to safeguard civil liberties, or how vital to protecting American lives.

 

Prosecute the New York Times. Gabriel Schoenfeld … explains, "By means of that disclosure, the New York Times has tipped off al Qaeda, our declared mortal enemy, that we have been listening to every one of its communications that we have been able to locate, and have succeeded in doing so even as its operatives switch from line to line or location to location."

 

Is Al-Jazeera Less Biased Than The New York Times? Sadly, this once again demonstrated how America's media are fighting a different battle than its soldiers. After all, for publications that have been voicing loud and almost constant opposition to this war for several years, any positive development that leads to their expressly desired troop withdrawal should be heralded from the rooftops. On their part, any behavior to the contrary indicates media that want the troops to leave, but only if they do so in loss and shame.

 

Has the New York Times Violated the Espionage Act? What the New York Times has done is nothing less than to compromise the centerpiece of our defensive efforts in the war on terrorism. If information about the NSA program had been quietly conveyed to an al-Qaeda operative on a microdot, or on paper with invisible ink, there can be no doubt that the episode would have been treated by the government as a cut-and-dried case of espionage. Publishing it for the world to read, the Times has accomplished the same end while at the same time congratulating itself for bravely defending the First Amendment and thereby protecting us — from, presumably, ourselves.

 

Blurring distinctions between murderers and their victims: It's a journalistic atrocity to blur the distinction between murderers and their victims, but that's what both the New York Times and Newsweek decided to do in their lurid coverage of the Middle East.

 

Read the entire disgusting history at….

 

http://www.akdart.com/nyt.html

Anonymous ID: 10541f Jan. 21, 2020, 2:29 a.m. No.7865240   🗄️.is đź”—kun

Urinalism…KEK! Cheers to the Anon that contributed this meme…Perfection!

 

New York Times aka The Al-Qaeda Times, Treason Central-Times, Terrorist Tipping Times….Has a long history of Anti-American Behavior and should be prosecuted….

 

The New York Times and Iran: The New York Times has been criticized for helping terrorists in the past by disclosing investigatory methods and rendition policies and practices, supporting them in its editorial pages and allowing terror suspects to spin their stories in the news section, disclosing methods our nation has used to prevent funds from reaching terrorists, condemned the existence of prisons holding terrorists, criticizing the laws brought to bear to prevent terrorism, and whitewashing or apologizing for terror when it occurs.

 

The Worst of (the) Times. It has become more and more transparent that the New York Times leans not only left, but far enough away from mainstream America so as to reach out to our enemies in the War on Terror.

 

The terrorist Tipping Times: The New York Times (proudly publishing all the secrets unfit to spill since 9/11) and their reckless anonymous sources (come out, come out, you cowards) tipped off terrorists to America's efforts to track their financial activities. Guess what? It isn't the first time blabbermouth journalists have jeopardized terror-financing investigations since Sept. 11, according to the government

 

The Al-Qaeda Times: You could call it "Treason Central," or "al Qaeda West," but no matter what you call it, the building housing the once-august New York Times at 229 West 43rd St. in New York City is a beehive of anti-American hostility, where selling out the nation's secrets has become the newspaper's stock in trade.

 

All the News That's Fit to Prosecute. The congressional rebuke of the paper makes it clear that the American people, speaking through their representatives, are more distressed by the help given to al Qaeda by the Times than by some purely hypothetical danger to civil liberties.

 

The New York Times is a national security threat. So drunk is it on its own power and so antagonistic to the Bush administration that it will expose every classified antiterror program it finds out about, no matter how legal the program, how carefully crafted to safeguard civil liberties, or how vital to protecting American lives.

 

Prosecute the New York Times. Gabriel Schoenfeld … explains, "By means of that disclosure, the New York Times has tipped off al Qaeda, our declared mortal enemy, that we have been listening to every one of its communications that we have been able to locate, and have succeeded in doing so even as its operatives switch from line to line or location to location."

 

Is Al-Jazeera Less Biased Than The New York Times? Sadly, this once again demonstrated how America's media are fighting a different battle than its soldiers. After all, for publications that have been voicing loud and almost constant opposition to this war for several years, any positive development that leads to their expressly desired troop withdrawal should be heralded from the rooftops. On their part, any behavior to the contrary indicates media that want the troops to leave, but only if they do so in loss and shame.

 

Has the New York Times Violated the Espionage Act? What the New York Times has done is nothing less than to compromise the centerpiece of our defensive efforts in the war on terrorism. If information about the NSA program had been quietly conveyed to an al-Qaeda operative on a microdot, or on paper with invisible ink, there can be no doubt that the episode would have been treated by the government as a cut-and-dried case of espionage. Publishing it for the world to read, the Times has accomplished the same end while at the same time congratulating itself for bravely defending the First Amendment and thereby protecting us — from, presumably, ourselves.

 

Blurring distinctions between murderers and their victims: It's a journalistic atrocity to blur the distinction between murderers and their victims, but that's what both the New York Times and Newsweek decided to do in their lurid coverage of the Middle East.

 

Read the entire disgusting history at….

 

http://www.akdart.com/nyt.html

Anonymous ID: 10541f Jan. 21, 2020, 2:46 a.m. No.7865275   🗄️.is đź”—kun   >>5285 >>5342 >>5523

Democrats Never Get Tired Of Trying To Impeach Republican Presidents

 

It’s the same old, same old with Democrats. Party leaders have called for impeaching Republican presidents for the last 36 years!

 

It's not surprising for another reason, too. For 36 years, Democrats have routinely called for impeaching Republican presidents at the drop of a hat.

 

Of course, it’s worth pointing out that the only two presidents ever impeached were Democrats.

 

https://www.dailywire.com/news/democrats-never-get-tired-trying-impeach-joseph-curl

 

NOTABLE

 

 

https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/Trial-Memorandum-of-President-Donald-J.-Trump.pdf