Anonymous ID: c5c14d Jan. 21, 2020, 3:17 p.m. No.7868588   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8800

Schiff is getting speedy with his talk. This is procedural BS neither side expecting Dems to win. McConnell already said they would table all amendments.

Schiff and his speedy talk on an expected loss is a TELL. His fear of grand loss is coming out.

He is losing to his emotions. Everyone else is slow and methodical. He is speeding up. Not a good look for him as it is typical to behave this way in closing arguments not preliminary BS

Anonymous ID: c5c14d Jan. 21, 2020, 3:31 p.m. No.7868700   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8707 >>8720 >>8727 >>8730 >>8734

For the life of me I cannot quote Q in many anon's favorite drop about introducing evidence .

We are watching it happen right now.

Dems are saying evidence they need is missing and by doing this, they are introducing said evidence to the public.

We have no proof their visuals are true or not but the public is seeing it as evidence and it will be taken as the truth of the matter just the same.

That Q drop is THIS right now!

Anonymous ID: c5c14d Jan. 21, 2020, 3:41 p.m. No.7868767   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7868727 Dems are legally introducing evidence not in record to this impeachment process with these amendments. They are telling the public about evidence that is not part of the record and will never be part of the record

Anonymous ID: c5c14d Jan. 21, 2020, 3:48 p.m. No.7868849   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Dems are claiming evidence exists and stating what it is without proof. They are legally introducing evidence into the impeachment process through this back door method.

This is the impeachment trial for them! They are trying to convince people BEFORE the trial with this dirty trick.

Anonymous ID: c5c14d Jan. 21, 2020, 3:53 p.m. No.7868894   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>8914 >>8916

I've only been home a little over an hour and this is pissing me off!

Dems are putting up chart boards suggesting things are true. If this were a courtroom the objection would be " assuming facts NOT IN EVIDENCE"

Anonymous ID: c5c14d Jan. 21, 2020, 4:07 p.m. No.7869058   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7868946 I stand by my identification as lawfag jr to suggest I am not an expert but jr level experience. I do not put that in the name category, therefore it is not namefagging. I simply included my level of experience within a post. Get over yourself. It was no infraction upon you, it was meant to assist all of us in processing the legal aspects. If you're a shilll, forget aout my kindness and just fuck all the way off

Anonymous ID: c5c14d Jan. 21, 2020, 4:31 p.m. No.7869335   🗄️.is 🔗kun

This is so transparent to me. The dems are putting up boards with cherry picked lines of convos saying we need this document subpoenaed to place into evidence , thereby introducing the evidence to the public. POTUS lawyers cannot cross examine a poster board so the public will walk away thinking it true.

There are 2 juries. This type of pretrial hearing would NEVER happen in front of a jury for the very reason of admissibility.