>>7873009

>>7873022

>theocracy

"a background in" this?

noun

a system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god.

"his ambition is to lead a worldwide theocracy"

the commonwealth of Israel from the time of Moses until the election of Saul as king.

noun: Theocracy; noun: the Theocracy

I'm very much a Christian who doesn't go to church (hardly ever) but my background is not in the "government rule" aspect of the faith. You have very interesting digits so far this bread. Why do you ask?

My favorite theory about 53-47 seems to be going down the drain. (non-Jesus pic related)

>>7873177

No denomination here, but I'd call myself Pentacostal-ish if I were forced to narrow it down. I can well-relate to Baptist. I've considered all of what you're saying. I don't know what to think except that I trust NO ONE but God and faith in Jesus. A great deception isn't great if it's not really compelling. I rule very little out–I think in many ways we've been already living a great deception all our lives. Who knows about the extreme stuff we discuss here? 1% of the population? I think "end times" eschatology predictions are to all be taken with a serious grain of sand. Israelites frequently got prophecies all wrong in anticipation, as compared with what the delivered product turned out to be. Just look at what they expected, and got, in terms of a messiah. NOT what they were expecting. This is all compounded by the fact that I believe our language has been designed to greatly deceive us. I think things written in the Bible in seemingly plain English are greatly misinterpreted because we don't know English like we think we do. I think the mark of the beast has been well under way for a while and we just don't know what "buy or sell" means. I also think "stand in the temple" means to stand in a physical body/clone/drone/meatsuit. We've got temples on our forehead and the body is the temple of the holy spirit. As far as nothing seeming organic and it all looking quite scripted… to the keen observer, yes, but to the masses? Probably not. I'm watching for every imaginable scheme and I'm well past the cognitive dissonance of some giant realizations that contradicted what I THOUGHT this world and the "people" in it were.

>>7873185

Agree.

>>7873330

>>7873305

I sense you may know more than you can say. I've had a pretty rocky path too (but not as "well"?). I examine all communications probably TOO closely now. When I see "POS" I don't know if we're tallking common Piece Of Shit or the "POS" in "apostrophe" which is a concept I'm only on the edge of understanding, having never knowingly engaged in such things.

Glad you're on the right path now.

>Are we here because we are the ones that would notice?

Sure. Maybe. I don't know if I no-tie-see or not. Kek. How many people are here? So few that a bread takes as long as it does. I think we fill a spot, but in terms of getting it out to the world, we're a pretty small band of oddballs.

>>7873398

It's interesting to see the media machine at work (in the right hands). I read the foxnews.com version of this earlier. Slow roll-out to disclosure. At first, it pissed me off that the article still sides with the lie, but then of course I step back and see the big picture. First you plant the seed in people's minds while still attacking it as being "nuts"/"crazy"/"conspiracy theory". They have time to digest that nugget, maybe look into it, develop acceptance of the tiny bit of cognitive dissonance the idea of a textbook including such a thing would create. In weeks or months, there'll be something else. And then another. Slow drip makes it palatable.

>>7873446

>>7873447

Yes. It could be frozen in ice on total pause. Like much of our other fake history has been for… well… all of history since it occurred.

(also excuse to drop fake history memes)

>>7873456

>make sure people don't become so sick they end up flooding the hospitals, or worse..chase the scums down the streets with their own brand of justice

As much as I think some of this is needed, I also see that the entire civilized world unraveling doesn't exactly achieve the desired goal of any good-hearted, rational mind.

>>7873470

>cancer

case in point.

As much as I want people to know cures were kept from us intentionally, does worldwide simultaneous revelation of that yield a good net effect? If it's ever to be realized, it probably needs to come in small waves of revelation, at different times, for different people… but that still violates the part of me that thinks it keeps us ignorant cattle still being fed lies. (Meme concept related)

>>7873456

oh shit.

it JUST occurred to me.

are the HOSPITALS (deep basements/catacombs) the physical location of the "knowingly" swamps? I figured "waterworks" type buildings and such.

THAT'S WHY 99% WOULD BE IN THE HOSPITAL!?!?!? With pitchforks and torches!