>>7873439 pb
>>7873398 pb
> It's interesting to see the media machine at work (in the right hands). I read the foxnews.com version of this earlier. Slow roll-out to disclosure. At first, it pissed me off that the article still sides with the lie, but then of course I step back and see the big picture. First you plant the seed in people's minds while still attacking it as being "nuts"/"crazy"/"conspiracy theory". They have time to digest that nugget, maybe look into it, develop acceptance of the tiny bit of cognitive dissonance the idea of a textbook including such a thing would create. In weeks or months, there'll be something else. And then another. Slow drip makes it palatable.
As a published author in a major professional financial publication used by both graduate students and professionals, we don't put out treatises or textbooks without verifying punctuations, dots, crosses and grammar--much more, controversial claims like that! It's printed forever. Author had better be sure it's not just some conspiracy theory floating around.