Anonymous ID: b54e45 Jan. 22, 2020, 10:03 a.m. No.7876230   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6260 >>6386 >>6491 >>6727

inquiry

 

has a list of the crimes Barr covered up in his first terms been compiled?

so one can determine how much they have to forgive in order to

"trust Barr"?

while reconciling with

"no deals"?

why can't this subject matter be discussed?

Does it make it difficult to maintain the hope?

Does it run contrary to many Q arguments?

If diggers dig, then why not understand what crimes Barr is getting a pass for?

Or do you think the head justice imposer will then point the DOJ on himself?

Anonymous ID: b54e45 Jan. 22, 2020, 10:12 a.m. No.7876305   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6317 >>6325 >>6491

>>7876260

so no list has been compiled and reviewed?

How did anons confirm their belief structure of trust Barr and no deals if not compiled and considered?

I think a lawfag would be best suited to compile such a list, as why I was inquiring about annon approved work?

Anonymous ID: b54e45 Jan. 22, 2020, 10:19 a.m. No.7876385   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6423

>>7876317

I try to rationalize the hope in Q while observing what I can see and verify IRL, so as to understand if hope is being encouraged so as to sideline action?

evil needs permission energy and focus, this theory seems to support those thought trains more than the wait for justice while doing nothing to fight against MSM and social media, and this is just the first stop on the just doesn't add up trainmany more, would you like all the contradictions written out?

Anonymous ID: b54e45 Jan. 22, 2020, 10:26 a.m. No.7876444   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6458 >>6491 >>6510 >>6687 >>6734

>>7876325

yeah,

anon called me faggot,

I'm part of this exclusive club,

here to get my daily talking points from dedicated anons,

you guys beat me into never questioning my dear leader Q and his mighty fierce sheep herd of board police anons

sorry your so scared of questions that make your hope seem rather hopeless, as I observe what is happening, not what you say is happening

Anonymous ID: b54e45 Jan. 22, 2020, 10:34 a.m. No.7876507   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7876458

so you arrived at your belief on your own without reconciling such a major point?

especially when you merge the timing of Barr joining the party and the Bush/no name hero funeral

/ burial procession and the ever so curious envelopes anons like to speculate about?

yes I was hopeful some lawfag had done the more reliable research than my novice law research would have generated (at least it thoroughness)

Anonymous ID: b54e45 Jan. 22, 2020, 10:42 a.m. No.7876584   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6600 >>6656

>>7876458

>>7876510

>>7876491

 

you guys are so easy to find and out

all the posts you make seem for distraction from points you don't like to points that support Q hope

are you guys real, or the real paid shills?

for I am a regular person paid by myself to ask questions and relentlessly pursue the motivation behind such claims, paid in full with wisdom so as to not be anothers' fool

Anonymous ID: b54e45 Jan. 22, 2020, 10:54 a.m. No.7876669   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>6758

>>7876600

yes I asked,

your asking us to believe it's not of value,

yet your belief is built on an unfounded ill considered foundation if such a list was not considered

 

I would of thought autist would have dug out this information in order to completely see the truth,

why i asked, thinking one would have already been done, i'm sure all your questions building your foundation were validated by only your digging, so convinced

a little concerned at the gravity of their decision / hope without considering the answers to such important questions

if your able to rationalize your belief on incomplete information that says more about you than me, think mirror

dig meme pray