The dems are so out of ammo they are showing reruns
Watkins just made a non-confirmation confirmation of Q. Wish I knew where he really stood.
To be more clear, Watkins made the same argument for Q being "real" that Miracle on 34th street does for Santa.
You know damn well what I mean, anon. Watkins has perhaps a unique view that we do not, and his opinion as to whether or not Q is "real" … i.e. if Q is who he says he is… is possibly useful intel. Either Q is who he says he is or he is an egg sandwich, mangling the words of CS Lewis. A million people believing a lie still makes it a lie.
I am proceeding with faith that Q is who he says he is. But we should not ignore info along the way.