Small Plane With at Least 4 On Board Crashes in Southern California

On arriving at the scene, the local police and fire teams discovered that the plane and the nearby area were on fire, with approximately 80 gallons of fuel burnt as a result of the crash.

A small plane has crashed near the town of Corona, in the state of California, local police and fire departments said on Wednesday.

The authorities later said there were four fatalities resulting from the accident.

https://sputniknews.com/us/202001231078108574-small-plane-with-at-least-4-on-board-crashes-in-southern-california/

Sanders Wants Voters To Elect The First Jewish Pres., Says He’s ‘Not…Involved In Organized Religion’

In a video released Tuesday by the Bernie Sanders 2020 presidential campaign, Joel Rubin, Sanders’ Jewish Outreach Director, made the case for electing Bernie Sanders as the country’s first Jewish president. In a recent interview with The New York Times, however, Sanders said he’s “not actively involved in organized religion.”

“I believe that Bernie is the right person to be our president right now, at this time, because his values are intrinsically Jewish values,” Rubin said. Further, Rubin said Sanders promotes the Jewish teaching of “Tikkun Olam”, which means to repair the world.

Sen. Sanders (D-VT) was raised in a Jewish community in Brooklyn, New York, was Bar Mitzvahed at the Kings Highway Jewish Center, and, even, once lived on a Kibbutz, an agricultural commune, in Israel for several months.

“I believe in God. I believe in the universality of people. That what happens to you impacts me. And I certainly believe in the constitutional right of freedom of religion. And I will strongly defend that,” Sanders told The New York Times, “And by the way, what that means is that we will end the Muslim ban in this country imposed by Donald Trump, because I think people in this country have the right to freely enjoy their religions and participate in religious life that interests them.”

Sanders has been a prominent voice for the progressive Jewish community. Last year, Sanders spoke at the J Street annual conference, a self-described pro-Israel advocacy group that often criticizes Israel’s right to self-defense. During his speech, Sanders called Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu ‘racist’ and defended that comment by saying it’s not ‘anti-semitic.’

U.S. aid to Israel was the next point of contention for Sanders, who offered a conditional plan for the $3.8 billion given annually to Jewish State. He said that if the aid were to continue, the Jewish State would need to ‘change it’s relationship’ with Gaza by offering a portion of that aid to them.

“My solution is to say to Israel, you get $3.8 billion every single year. If you want military aid, you’re going to have to fundamentally change your relationship to the people of Gaza.” said Sanders, “In fact, I think it is fair to say that some of that $3.8 billion should go right now into humanitarian aid in Gaza.”

Former U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley, an ardent defender of the US-Israel alliance, denounced his conditional demands at the time on Twitter. Haley wrote, “Just when you thought Bernie Sanders couldn’t get any more radical, he outdid himself. He wants to take money we give to Israel to defend itself from terrorists, and give it to Gaza, which is run by terrorists?? Unreal. Why isn’t every other Dem pres candidate saying he’s wrong? That sentiment was echoed by many mainstream Israel supporters.

The Democrat Socialist also posed in a picture holding a sign that read “Jews Against the Occupation” with representatives of the group IfNotNow, a progressive group that advertises as the “Jewish resistance.”

The organization applauded the endorsement on Twitter saying, “Our member in NH just asked Bernie Sanders if he’s also on anti-Occupation Jew and looks like the answer is YES!”

In Sanders’ campaign video, Rubin argued that Sanders is the candidate to promote a progressive agenda that will drive out hatred towards the Jewish community and cited the atrocities of the holocaust that led to the genocidal extermination of 6 million Jews.

“We need someone equipped in the White House who understands how to fight against this, not just because it makes good politics, but because he actually understands what it means to stand up to hate speech and bigotry,” Rubin explained.

https://saraacarter.com/sanders-wants-voters-to-elect-the-first-jewish-pres-says-hes-not-involved-in-organized-religion/

Trump makes Roe anniversary ‘Sanctity of Life Day’: ‘We will never tire of defending innocent life’

'I ask every citizen of this great Nation to listen to the sound of silence caused by a generation lost to us, and then to raise their voices for all affected by abortion, both seen and unseen.'

WASHINGTON, D.C., January 22, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – U.S. President Donald J. Trump has declared January 22, the anniversary of the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision imposing abortion on demand across the country, to be “National Sanctity of Human Life Day.”

In a proclamation issued yesterday, Trump declared that “every person — the born and unborn, the poor, the downcast, the disabled, the infirm, and the elderly — has inherent value” and said that the U.S. “proudly and strongly reaffirms our commitment to protect the precious gift of life at every stage, from conception to natural death.”

He touted his administration’s pro-life achievements at home and abroad.

The proclamation referenced his administration’s efforts to build “an international coalition to dispel the concept of abortion as a fundamental human right” and said that his administration would “oppose any projects that attempt to assert a global right to taxpayer‑funded abortion on demand, up to the moment of delivery.”

“We will never tire of defending innocent life — at home or abroad,” he promised.

The proclamation referenced the recent decline in the number and rate of abortions in America.

“Americans should celebrate this decline in the number and rate of abortions, which represents lives saved,” said Trump.

Trump urged Congress to “prohibit abortions of later-term babies.” On the campaign trail, he has repeatedly mentioned Democrats’ defense of abortion through all nine months of pregnancy and even their opposition to banning infanticide.

Trump also issued a particular thanks to pro-lifers and those who support women in “unexpected pregnancies” and who help to “provide healing to women who have had abortions.”

He wrote:

As a Nation, we must remain steadfastly dedicated to the profound truth that all life is a gift from God, who endows every person with immeasurable worth and potential. Countless Americans are tireless defenders of life and champions for the vulnerable among us. We are grateful for those who support women experiencing unexpected pregnancies, those who provide healing to women who have had abortions, and those who welcome children into their homes through foster care and adoption. On National Sanctity of Human Life Day, we celebrate the wonderful gift of life and renew our resolve to build a culture where life is always revered.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/trump-makes-roe-anniversary-sanctity-of-life-day-we-will-never-tire-of-defending-innocent-life

The New Mind Control. “Subliminal Stimulation”, Controlling People without Their Knowledge

The internet has spawned subtle forms of influence that can flip elections and manipulate everything we say, think and do

This incisive article was first published by Global Research on March 3, 2016

Over the past century, more than a few great writers have expressed concern about humanity’s future. In The Iron Heel(1908), the American writer Jack London pictured a world in which a handful of wealthy corporate titans – the ‘oligarchs’ – kept the masses at bay with a brutal combination of rewards and punishments. Much of humanity lived in virtual slavery, while the fortunate ones were bought off with decent wages that allowed them to live comfortably – but without any real control over their lives.

In We (1924), the brilliant Russian writer Yevgeny Zamyatin, anticipating the excesses of the emerging Soviet Union, envisioned a world in which people were kept in check through pervasive monitoring. The walls of their homes were made of clear glass, so everything they did could be observed. They were allowed to lower their shades an hour a day to have sex, but both the rendezvous time and the lover had to be registered first with the state.

In Brave New World (1932), the British author Aldous Huxley pictured a near-perfect society in which unhappiness and aggression had been engineered out of humanity through a combination of genetic engineering and psychological conditioning. And in the much darker novel 1984 (1949), Huxley’s compatriot George Orwell described a society in which thought itself was controlled; in Orwell’s world, children were taught to use a simplified form of English called Newspeak in order to assure that they could never express ideas that were dangerous to society.

These are all fictional tales, to be sure, and in each the leaders who held the power used conspicuous forms of control that at least a few people actively resisted and occasionally overcame. But in the non-fiction bestseller The Hidden Persuaders (1957) – recently released in a 50th-anniversary edition – the American journalist Vance Packard described a ‘strange and rather exotic’ type of influence that was rapidly emerging in the United States and that was, in a way, more threatening than the fictional types of control pictured in the novels. According to Packard, US corporate executives and politicians were beginning to use subtle and, in many cases, completely undetectable methods to change people’s thinking, emotions and behaviour based on insights from psychiatry and the social sciences.

Most of us have heard of at least one of these methods: subliminal stimulation, or what Packard called ‘subthreshold effects’ – the presentation of short messages that tell us what to do but that are flashed so briefly we aren’t aware we have seen them. In 1958, propelled by public concern about a theatre in New Jersey that had supposedly hidden messages in a movie to increase ice cream sales, the National Association of Broadcasters – the association that set standards for US television – amended its code to prohibit the use of subliminal messages in broadcasting. In 1974, the Federal Communications Commission opined that the use of such messages was ‘contrary to the public interest’. Legislation to prohibit subliminal messaging was also introduced in the US Congress but never enacted. Both the UK and Australia have strict laws prohibiting it.

Subliminal stimulation is probably still in wide use in the US – it’s hard to detect, after all, and no one is keeping track of it – but it’s probably not worth worrying about. Research suggests that it has only a small impact, and that it mainly influences people who are already motivated to follow its dictates; subliminal directives to drink affect people only if they’re already thirsty.

https://www.globalresearch.ca/the-new-mind-control-subliminal-stimulation-controlling-people-without-their-knowledge/5511628

1/2

>>7879265

The Bond study was largely ignored, but another Facebook experiment, published in 2014 in PNAS, prompted protests around the world. In this study, for a period of a week, 689,000 Facebook users were sent news feeds that contained either an excess of positive terms, an excess of negative terms, or neither. Those in the first group subsequently used slightly more positive terms in their communications, while those in the second group used slightly more negative terms in their communications. This was said to show that people’s ‘emotional states’ could be deliberately manipulated on a massive scale by a social media company, an idea that many people found disturbing. People were also upset that a large-scale experiment on emotion had been conducted without the explicit consent of any of the participants.

Facebook’s consumer profiles are undoubtedly massive, but they pale in comparison with those maintained by Google, which is collecting information about people 24/7, using more than 60 different observation platforms – the search engine, of course, but also Google Wallet, Google Maps, Google Adwords, Google Analytics, Chrome, Google Docs, Android, YouTube, and on and on. Gmail users are generally oblivious to the fact that Google stores and analyses every email they write, even the drafts they never send – as well as all the incoming email they receive from both Gmail and non-Gmail users.

According to Google’s privacy policy – to which one assents whenever one uses a Google product, even when one has not been informed that he or she is using a Google product – Google can share the information it collects about you with almost anyone, including government agencies. But never with you. Google’s privacy is sacrosanct; yours is nonexistent.

Could Google and ‘those we work with’ (language from the privacy policy) use the information they are amassing about you for nefarious purposes – to manipulate or coerce, for example? Could inaccurate information in people’s profiles (which people have no way to correct) limit their opportunities or ruin their reputations?

Certainly, if Google set about to fix an election, it could first dip into its massive database of personal information to identify just those voters who are undecided. Then it could, day after day, send customised rankings favouring one candidate to just those people. One advantage of this approach is that it would make Google’s manipulation extremely difficult for investigators to detect.

2/2

OPCW Inspector Debunks Doctored Syria Report. “The Chemical Weapons Incident That Never Occurred”

The OPCW Fact Finding Mission willfully falsified information, falsely blaming Syrian authorities for a CW incident that never occurred.

Last November, WikiLeaks published information from an OPCW whistleblower.

A member of its fact finding mission to Douma, Syria, he expressed grave “concern over intentional bias introduced to a redacted version of the report he co-authored.”

The OPCW’s so-called Fact Finding Mission (FFM) doctored its March 2019 report on the alleged April 7, 2018 Douma, Syria CW incident — that never happened, falsely saying the following:

“Regarding the alleged use of toxic chemicals as a weapon in Douma (Syria)…evaluation and analysis…of information gathered by the FFM (delaying its visit to the site for 11 days) provide(s) reasonable grounds that the use of a toxic chemical as a weapon has taken place on April 7, 2018.”

“This toxic chemical contained reactive chlorine. The toxic chemical was likely molecular chlorine.”

The so-called incident was fake, a US/NATO-staged false flag, Syria wrongfully blamed for a victimless nonevent.

No one in Douma died, was hospitalized, or became ill from exposure to chemical or other toxins.

Local eyewitnesses and medical personal debunked the falsified narrative. Russian technical experts found no evidence of chemical or other toxins in soil samples and other analysis of the site.

Yet the OPCW FFM willfully falsified information — in deference to Western interests, falsely blaming Syrian authorities for a CW incident that never occurred.

In Monday Security Council testimony, former OPCW inspector team leader Ian Henderson debunked the agency’s doctored report on the alleged April 2018 Douma CW incident, saying the following:

“There were two teams deployed, one team, which I joined shortly after the start of field deployments, was to Douma in Syria, the other team deployed to country X,” adding:

“(T)he so-called FFM core team(’s) inspectors…deployed (to) Douma (were) dismiss(ed).”

“(F)inal FFM report…findings…were contradictory…a complete turnaround (from) what the team” actually found on the ground.

When the “interim report (was released) in July 2018, our understanding was that we had serious misgivings that a chemical attack had occurred.”

“(T)he final FFM report…does not reflect the views of the team members (sent) to Douma…”

It “did not make clear what new findings, facts, information, data, or analysis in the fields of witness testimony, toxicology studies, chemical analysis, and engineering, and/or ballistic studies had resulted in the complete turn-around in the situation from what was understood by the majority of the team, and the entire Douma team, in July 2018.”

“In my case, I had followed up with a further six months of engineering and ballistic studies into these cylinders, the result of which had provided further support for the view that there had not been a chemical attack.”

https://www.globalresearch.ca/opcw-inspector-debunks-doctored-syria-report-the-chemical-weapons-incident-that-never-occurred/5701378

>>7879223

Chin up Son, we all go there at times!

Have a watch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gj1EdoK-ROw&t=2s

LNA Shots Down Turkish UCAV And Imposes No-Fly Zone Over Tripoli (Photos)

The Libyan National Army (LNA) imposed a “no-fly zone” over an airport near the capital, Tripoli, a few hours after shooting down a Turkish armed drone in the same region.

The unmanned combat aerial vehicle (UCAV), a Turkish-made Bayraktar TB2, was shot down on January 22 afternoon by LNA units, right after it took off from the Mitiga International Airport in Tripoli’s eastern suburbs. The army claimed that the drone was on its way to attack its troops near the capital.

Earlier, at least six rockets landed in the Mitiga International Airport, forcing the authorities to halt all operations in the facility.

Maj. Gen. Ahmed Al-Mismari, a spokesman for the LNA, held a press conference after the two incidents announcing that the army had imposed a no-fly zone on the Mitiga International Airport.

“We announce the activation of a no-fly zone over entire Tripoli, especially over Mitiga airport, any military or civilian aircraft that take off or land at the airport, will be subjected to a response,” the spokesman said.

The Libyan commander noted that the no-fly zone will cover the area from the town of Garyan, south of Tripoli, to the town of Tarhunah ending on the capital’s shores.

https://southfront.org/lna-shots-down-turkish-ucav-and-imposes-no-fly-zone-over-tripoli-photos/

Trump trolls the trial as a Looney Tunes episode by tweeting video of Adam Schiff as Wile E. Coyote - while in the Senate president's lawyer Rudy Giuliani is named as running a 'corrupt scheme' to force Biden investigation

Adam Schiff said during his opening remarks during the second day of the Senate impeachment trial that Donald Trump is a 'despot'

He also said that a president like Trump is one that the framers feared, which is why they created the capabilities to remove him

'They knew what it was like to live under a despot and risked their lives to be free of it,' Schiff who is leading the team prosecuting Trump in the Senate, said

President Trump mocked Schiff by tweeting a mock-up Wil E. Coyote cartoon portraying Schiff's failed efforts to catch him

Democrats began presenting their opening arguments on the second day of the impeachment trial Wednesday

Democrats made repeat use of video clips of Trump asking Russia to hack emails and saying he would accept opposition research from a foreign power

Minority Leader Chuck Schumer said earlier in the day that Democrats will continue to push for the ability to call witnesses in the Senate impeachment trial

He ruled out the potential of allowing Republicans to call Joe or Hunter Biden '[They] have nothing to do with this,' he asserted to reporters Wednesday

Democrats have floated calling both acting Chief of Staff Mick Mulvaney and former national security adviser John Bolton as new witnesses Republicans want to hear from both Joe and hunter if witnesses are permitted

Trump has said he wants to hear from the anonymous whistle-blower whose report led to the launch of the impeachment inquiry in the first place

The seven managers will argue, in part, that witnesses should be called

The prosecution and defense debated on Tuesday the rules set forth by Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell for the trial

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7917413/Democrats-start-prosecuting-House-impeachment-managers-tell-senators-want-Trump-removed.html

Red Cross denies claims it is stockpiling bushfire donations for future disasters

Charity has been criticised

The Red Cross has denied claims it is holding back donations for bushfire victims to save the money for future disasters.

The charity has been criticised for committing only $30 million of the $115 million raised for immediate support to affected communities.

Red Cross director of Australian services Noel Clement said the charity had allocated $30 million for immediate relief for people who lost the homes, confirming "the balance of the funds is for bushfires".

"I'm happy to clarify we are not stockpiling - the balance of the funds is for the bushfires," Mr Clement told Today.

"We have allocated funds to support our teams on the ground. We have been raising money since July and we have been supporting over 60,000 people since September.

"We allocated $16 million to be committed to working in the communities for the next three years to support communities in the recovery."

The Red Cross said it had already handed out over 700 grants worth $10,000 and was working through new applications for assistance as quickly as possible.

"Our average time is six days to get the applications through and approved," he said.

"Understandably, some people are having trouble in the field being unable to give us the basic information we are asking for to make sure we are protecting against fraud.

"We have volunteers in recovery centres with iPads helping people to do it. We have been taking people across to banks to get basic bank details.

"It is a fairly difficult situation for people, we are 100 per cent committed to make this as easy for people as we possibly can."

Mr Clement said $5 million of the funds had been given to support the Red Cross teams on the ground, with further money needed to be spent on "administrative costs".

"We have committed that no more than up to 10 cents in the dollar will be used for administrative costs," he said.

"That's to basically do the work we are doing at the moment in processing the applications. It is to make sure we are meeting legal requirements, make sure we are actually able to process applications as quickly as we can."

https://9now.nine.com.au/today/today-show-january-23-red-cross-claims/5c493754-fd9d-4d06-9a29-8de9215f5516

>>7879599

if he keeps his mouth shut????

>>7879690

Every post defending the Jews

YOU GLOW

Not all Jews are bad but to suggest they aren't major players in all this is denying reality!!!!

>>7879723