Anonymous ID: 36efaa Jan. 22, 2020, 3:57 p.m. No.7880183   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0199 >>0226

Seculow AGAIN saying they will put on an affirmative case!!!!!!!!!!!! Fox News TV no sauce

YUGE!

That is saying POTUS plans to state something along the lines of "I am not guilty, they are"

An affirmative case shifts the burden of proof from prosecution to defendant.

Anonymous ID: 36efaa Jan. 22, 2020, 4:11 p.m. No.7880351   🗄️.is 🔗kun

Dems argument that they didn't have time to wait years through the Court system because this was a National Security threat when referring to privilege disputes falls flat on it's face.

It presumes the SC would permit a National security threat to proceed while the Court system worked at their own pace.

Truth is, They had no proof any National Security was at threat and POTUS would have turned over anything needed to a Court to prove it