Anonymous ID: 558da6 Jan. 22, 2020, 3:46 p.m. No.7880024   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7879897

 

Nothing about his actions suggested he is pro-Trump. Why don't they call him anti-Schumer.

 

Vid embed has audio of incident and Senate reaction.

 

https://www.rawstory.com/2020/01/schumer-is-the-devil-screaming-pro-trump-protester-storms-the-senate-gallery-before-being-seized-by-capitol-police/

 

https://twitter.com/cspan/status/1220126363392389122

Anonymous ID: 558da6 Jan. 22, 2020, 4:03 p.m. No.7880264   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0284 >>0358 >>0440

>>7879900

 

I really like this theory, but I'd like to see some confirmation that Chief Justice actually signs any FISA warrants.

 

We know he appoints all FISC judges, but I've seen nothing so far that suggests he's actually signing them.

Anonymous ID: 558da6 Jan. 22, 2020, 4:06 p.m. No.7880298   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0309 >>0315

>>7880284

 

Right, and if you'd read my response, I wasn't asking if a FISC judge signs FISA warrants, because that much is obvious.

 

What I'm asking is for confirmation that CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS signs them.

Anonymous ID: 558da6 Jan. 22, 2020, 4:11 p.m. No.7880344   🗄️.is 🔗kun   >>0379

>>7880309

 

Yeah, no shit.

 

But the actions of a corrupt FISC judge signing a flawed warrant does not necessarily implicate Roberts who appointed them as FISC judge.

 

>>7880315

No, it's not fucking obvious that Roberts signed them. That is a big fucking assumption, that if true would make this >>7879900 anons theory more compelling.

Anonymous ID: 558da6 Jan. 22, 2020, 4:22 p.m. No.7880461   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7880440

 

That would certainly appear to be the case, and is far more of a reasonable argument to make against Roberts than saying he signed the warrants himself.