THANK YOU!
That's what I thought all along. Doesn't mean Roberts gets away clean, as he is obviously responsible for appointment of FISC judges and oversight of FISC activities, so he's potentially in deep shit still if they declas warrants that were approved without hearings and under gross misconduct by all those who signed it.
>>7879900 /pb theory on Roberts undoing
Still a decent theory (minus the Chief Justice signing the warrants)
>>7880315 /pb
>>7880379 /pb
>I'm not assuming, I'm paralegal fag
You were saying?