>>7889362

second second

>>7889409

what is the link for this gov doc on crowdstrike?

>>7889687

agree. i take info from sources i never see here on the board coz i'm not just a 'q follower'. i had a life b4 q and a wide range of interests/sources. Limiting oneself to some artificial list of sources that 'everyone' approves of doesn't make sense. But there are some people or orgs i'd never mention here bc it was be too provocative. With an open mind and discernment, you can glean useful info from almost any source.

Who can get beyond the WSJ paywall to find Q article?

>>7889868

i already did clear the cache.

how about you just list the article if you're good?

new Q's:

>>7889793 ————————————–——– Article lacking source doc. (Cap: >>7889858)

>>7889726 ————————————–——– there was “insufficient predication to establish probable cause." (Cap: )

WSJ missing (second cap)