"If the glove don't fit, you must acquit."
Think the OJ lawyer who is just the "Constitutional" reference on DJT team may play a bigger role?
"Since no crime exists, it must be dismissed."
"If the glove don't fit, you must acquit."
Think the OJ lawyer who is just the "Constitutional" reference on DJT team may play a bigger role?
"Since no crime exists, it must be dismissed."
If witnesses are allowed/called/examined…
WILL THEY WILL LIE,
even if sworn under oath?
Is the penalty for perjury less than if they speak the truth and expose themselves as treasonous, spies, traitors, RICO participants etc…?
If we see the Senate acquit DJT and he is not removed from office… most people will move along and see nothing else.
BUT,
would witnesses who lied during the hearing be held accountable for perjury and other charges that become exposed?
Doubt it.