You saw them yourself?
You actually saw it, or did you see it on TV?
You got any proof what you are saying?
Did you also see it coming out on the other side?
There were live witnesses on TV saying it must have been bombs, because they didn't see the plane.
There were also obvious actors on TV. You have to wonder why they would put actors on stage.
Why would you call a single post about it a "slide".
In one case the mass media would be directly involved in it, which would be game over for them and thus that detail is not irrelevant.
>There were both bombs and planes.
That doesn't really make sense.
When you have rigged the buildings, why would you risk it all going to hell by flying planes into them, and possibly failing to do so?
One has to assume that they would have used remote control, but why take that massive risk?
We know that it had to happen on exactly that date.
It was not just about new wars, but way way more.
Brady Bonds, etc.
The planes are the part that has very high risk attached to it.
Making it a psy-op makes way more sense, especially bc how human brain works.
Broadcast it on all stations and most people will make it up in their minds.
Only a very tiny part of all Americans could have seen it live.
That's why the live broadcast footage is so important.
I think they used remove control, to get at least one plane down to the ground, so that the people in there would be able (forced) to do their phone calls home as "evidence". That again makes sense (although it was a very dumb thing to do), because there is no massive risk involved like it failing. In the worst case you crash the plane and the people are dead.
Oh, plus.
Doing so also makes the truth sound absolutely crazy, which would be the best insurance there is.
It wouldn't even matter when the whole Bush family was found out and executed for it.
What matters though is the mass media machine.