>>7905854

> What'd I miss oldfags?

FBI Anon - Vegas Assasination - Q

But most old fags won't quibble much.

I dug deep on the Las Vegas police.

Bunch of corrupt, wicked sons a bitches run that mob.

Also the deaths of those who survived.

And the Thousand Oaks, CA nightclub where a shooter killed several during a Vegas shooting survivors Special Event.

You can deny the assassination evidence all you want. But if Vegas was a lone nut ball, why have all those survivors died from violence? It's so far outside a random distribution.

>>7905933

Chek'T

>He’s still a liberal hack

^^Moran Rek'T

Murkowski, RINO Alaska. SHE, not HE.

LURK MOAR, POST WAAAAAY LESS

>>7905958

>>7905958

>calling out clowns makes them visible.

>

>visible clowns have no effect.

>>7906080

>If you feel the need to "call out clowns" go right ahead, but the pretense that it is on behalf of how mockingbirds will respond is rather silly and/or naive.

401720 is correct.

I think 35fb74 implies that having refutation in the bread provides evidence to argue against a smear. MSM will do whatever they want.

Filter if you need an echo chamber.

However, refutation is necessary for many reasons:

1. Without it, newfags and casual lurkers might be confused or swayed by bullshit.

2. It's good for general morale. A constant unanswered deluge of negative arguments and insults leave anon's feeling overwhelmed.

3. It's important to know what arguments, tactics and strategies our opponents are using, in order to counter them. Red pilling is far more subtle that shoving pro Trump memes is normies faces.