Anonymous ID: 34472a Jan. 24, 2020, 7:09 p.m. No.7905730   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7905681

What? Are you kidding?

You mean we don't have to read each one in full each time, each bread?

Maybe that's why I never get time to read the notables. kek

Anonymous ID: 34472a Jan. 24, 2020, 7:20 p.m. No.7905843   🗄️.is 🔗kun

>>7905750

Wouldn't he be safer under U.S. Due Process Law protections?

He's a journalist, right?

but then again, there is the Epstein conundrum.

Is the UK trying to protect him or trying to fuck him up more?

Q spoke in positive terms about him here:

 

3341

Julian Assange Is under Protection; He Is the Key to the DNC Data Leak and Seth Rich Murder

Q!!mG7VJxZNCI

23 May 2019 - 7:01:32 PM

>>6572364 (/pb)

Under protection.

Threat is real.

Key to DNC 'source' 'hack' '187'.

Q